Re-implement map_over_datasets using group_subtrees

DATATREE_MIGRATION_GUIDE.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ This guide is for previous users of the prototype `datatree.DataTree` class in t
 > [!IMPORTANT]
 > There are breaking changes! You should not expect that code written with `xarray-contrib/datatree` will work without any modifications.  At the absolute minimum you will need to change the top-level import statement, but there are other changes too.
 
-We have made various changes compared to the prototype version. These can be split into three categories: data model changes, which affect the hierarchal structure itself, integration with xarray's IO backends; and minor API changes, which mostly consist of renaming methods to be more self-consistent.
+We have made various changes compared to the prototype version. These can be split into three categories: data model changes, which affect the hierarchal structure itself; integration with xarray's IO backends; and minor API changes, which mostly consist of renaming methods to be more self-consistent.
 
 ### Data model changes
 
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ These alignment checks happen at tree construction time, meaning there are some
 
 The alignment checks allowed us to add "Coordinate Inheritance", a much-requested feature where indexed coordinate variables are now "inherited" down to child nodes. This allows you to define common coordinates in a parent group that are then automatically available on every child node. The distinction between a locally-defined coordinate variables and an inherited coordinate that was defined on a parent node is reflected in the `DataTree.__repr__`. Generally if you prefer not to have these variables be inherited you can get more similar behaviour to the old `datatree` package by removing indexes from coordinates, as this prevents inheritance.
 
+Tree structure checks between multiple trees (i.e., `DataTree.isomorophic`) and pairing of nodes in arithmetic has also changed. Nodes are now matched (with `xarray.group_subtrees`) based on their relative paths, without regard to the order in which child nodes are defined.
+
 For further documentation see the page in the user guide on Hierarchical Data.
 
 ### Integrated backends

doc/api.rst

@@ -749,6 +749,17 @@ Manipulate the contents of a single ``DataTree`` node.
    DataTree.assign
    DataTree.drop_nodes
 
+DataTree Operations
+-------------------
+
+Apply operations over multiple ``DataTree`` objects.
+
+.. autosummary::
+   :toctree: generated/
+
+   map_over_datasets
+   group_subtrees
+
 Comparisons
 -----------
 
@@ -954,7 +965,6 @@ DataTree methods
 
    open_datatree
    open_groups
-   map_over_datasets
    DataTree.to_dict
    DataTree.to_netcdf
    DataTree.to_zarr

doc/user-guide/hierarchical-data.rst

@@ -362,21 +362,26 @@ This returns an iterable of nodes, which yields them in depth-first order.
     for node in vertebrates.subtree:
         print(node.path)
 
-A very useful pattern is to use :py:class:`~xarray.DataTree.subtree` conjunction with the :py:class:`~xarray.DataTree.path` property to manipulate the nodes however you wish,
-then rebuild a new tree using :py:meth:`xarray.DataTree.from_dict()`.
+Similarly, :py:class:`~xarray.DataTree.subtree_with_keys` returns an iterable of
+relative paths and corresponding nodes.
 
+A very useful pattern is to iterate over :py:class:`~xarray.DataTree.subtree_with_keys`
+to manipulate nodes however you wish, then rebuild a new tree using
+:py:meth:`xarray.DataTree.from_dict()`.
 For example, we could keep only the nodes containing data by looping over all nodes,
 checking if they contain any data using :py:class:`~xarray.DataTree.has_data`,
 then rebuilding a new tree using only the paths of those nodes:
 
 .. ipython:: python
 
-    non_empty_nodes = {node.path: node.dataset for node in dt.subtree if node.has_data}
+    non_empty_nodes = {
+        path: node.dataset for path, node in dt.subtree_with_keys if node.has_data
+    }
     xr.DataTree.from_dict(non_empty_nodes)
 
 You can see this tree is similar to the ``dt`` object above, except that it is missing the empty nodes ``a/c`` and ``a/c/d``.
 
-(If you want to keep the name of the root node, you will need to add the ``name`` kwarg to :py:class:`~xarray.DataTree.from_dict`, i.e. ``DataTree.from_dict(non_empty_nodes, name=dt.root.name)``.)
+(If you want to keep the name of the root node, you will need to add the ``name`` kwarg to :py:class:`~xarray.DataTree.from_dict`, i.e. ``DataTree.from_dict(non_empty_nodes, name=dt.name)``.)
 
 .. _manipulating trees:
 
@@ -573,38 +578,85 @@ Then calculate the RMS value of these signals:
 
 .. _multiple trees:
 
-We can also use the :py:meth:`~xarray.map_over_datasets` decorator to promote a function which accepts datasets into one which
-accepts datatrees.
+We can also use :py:func:`~xarray.map_over_datasets` apply a function over
+trees appearing in any positional argument.
 
 Operating on Multiple Trees
 ---------------------------
 
 The examples so far have involved mapping functions or methods over the nodes of a single tree,
 but we can generalize this to mapping functions over multiple trees at once.
 
+Iterating Over Multiple Trees
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+To iterate over the corresponding nodes in multiple trees, use
+:py:func:`~xarray.group_subtrees` instead of
+:py:class:`~xarray.DataTree.subtree_with_keys`:
+
+.. ipython:: python
+
+    dt1 = xr.DataTree.from_dict({"a": xr.Dataset({"x": 1}), "b": xr.Dataset({"x": 2})})
+    dt2 = xr.DataTree.from_dict(
+        {"a": xr.Dataset({"x": 10}), "b": xr.Dataset({"x": 20})}
+    )
+    for path, (node1, node2) in xr.group_subtrees(dt1, dt2):
+        print(path, int(node1["x"]), int(node2["x"]))
+
+To rebuild a tree after applying operations at each node, use
+:py:meth:`xarray.DataTree.from_dict()`:
+
+.. ipython:: python
+
+    result = {}
+    for path, (node1, node2) in xr.group_subtrees(dt1, dt2):
+        result[path] = node1.dataset + node2.dataset
+    xr.DataTree.from_dict(result)
+
+Or apply a function directly to paired datasets at every node using
+:py:func:`xarray.map_over_datasets`:
+
+.. ipython:: python
+
+    xr.map_over_datasets(lambda x, y: x + y, dt1, dt2)
+
 Comparing Trees for Isomorphism
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 For it to make sense to map a single non-unary function over the nodes of multiple trees at once,
-each tree needs to have the same structure. Specifically two trees can only be considered similar, or "isomorphic",
-if they have the same number of nodes, and each corresponding node has the same number of children.
-We can check if any two trees are isomorphic using the :py:meth:`~xarray.DataTree.isomorphic` method.
+each tree needs to have the same structure. Specifically two trees can only be considered similar,
+or "isomorphic", if the full paths to all of their descendent nodes are the same.
+
+Applying :py:func:`~xarray.group_subtrees` to trees with different structure
+raises :py:class:`~xarray.TreeIsomorphismError`:
 
 .. ipython:: python
     :okexcept:
 
-    dt1 = xr.DataTree.from_dict({"a": None, "a/b": None})
-    dt2 = xr.DataTree.from_dict({"a": None})
-    dt1.isomorphic(dt2)
+    tree = xr.DataTree.from_dict({"a": None, "a/b": None, "a/c": None})
+    simple_tree = xr.DataTree.from_dict({"a": None})
+    for _ in xr.group_subtrees(tree, simple_tree):
+        ...
+
+We can explicitly also check if any two trees are isomorphic using the :py:meth:`~xarray.DataTree.isomorphic` method:
+
+.. ipython:: python
+
+    tree.isomorphic(simple_tree)
+
+Corresponding tree nodes do not need to have the same data in order to be considered isomorphic:
+
+.. ipython:: python
+
+    tree_with_data = xr.DataTree.from_dict({"a": xr.Dataset({"foo": 1})})
+    simple_tree.isomorphic(tree_with_data)
 
-    dt3 = xr.DataTree.from_dict({"a": None, "b": None})
-    dt1.isomorphic(dt3)
+They also do not need to define child nodes in the same order:
 
-    dt4 = xr.DataTree.from_dict({"A": None, "A/B": xr.Dataset({"foo": 1})})
-    dt1.isomorphic(dt4)
+.. ipython:: python
 
-If the trees are not isomorphic a :py:class:`~xarray.TreeIsomorphismError` will be raised.
-Notice that corresponding tree nodes do not need to have the same name or contain the same data in order to be considered isomorphic.
+    reordered_tree = xr.DataTree.from_dict({"a": None, "a/c": None, "a/b": None})
+    tree.isomorphic(reordered_tree)
 
 Arithmetic Between Multiple Trees
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

doc/whats-new.rst

@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ New Features
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~
 - ``DataTree`` related functionality is now exposed in the main ``xarray`` public
   API. This includes: ``xarray.DataTree``, ``xarray.open_datatree``, ``xarray.open_groups``,
-  ``xarray.map_over_datasets``, ``xarray.register_datatree_accessor`` and
-  ``xarray.testing.assert_isomorphic``.
+  ``xarray.map_over_datasets``, ``xarray.group_subtrees``,
+  ``xarray.register_datatree_accessor`` and ``xarray.testing.assert_isomorphic``.
   By `Owen Littlejohns <https://github.com/owenlittlejohns>`_,
   `Eni Awowale <https://github.com/eni-awowale>`_,
   `Matt Savoie <https://github.com/flamingbear>`_,

xarray/__init__.py

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
 from xarray.core.dataarray import DataArray
 from xarray.core.dataset import Dataset
 from xarray.core.datatree import DataTree
-from xarray.core.datatree_mapping import TreeIsomorphismError, map_over_datasets
+from xarray.core.datatree_mapping import map_over_datasets
 from xarray.core.extensions import (
     register_dataarray_accessor,
     register_dataset_accessor,
@@ -45,7 +45,12 @@
 from xarray.core.merge import Context, MergeError, merge
 from xarray.core.options import get_options, set_options
 from xarray.core.parallel import map_blocks
-from xarray.core.treenode import InvalidTreeError, NotFoundInTreeError
+from xarray.core.treenode import (
+    InvalidTreeError,
+    NotFoundInTreeError,
+    TreeIsomorphismError,
+    group_subtrees,
+)
 from xarray.core.variable import IndexVariable, Variable, as_variable
 from xarray.namedarray.core import NamedArray
 from xarray.util.print_versions import show_versions
@@ -82,6 +87,7 @@
     "cross",
     "full_like",
     "get_options",
+    "group_subtrees",
     "infer_freq",
     "load_dataarray",
     "load_dataset",

xarray/core/computation.py

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 from xarray.core.merge import merge_attrs, merge_coordinates_without_align
 from xarray.core.options import OPTIONS, _get_keep_attrs
 from xarray.core.types import Dims, T_DataArray
-from xarray.core.utils import is_dict_like, is_scalar, parse_dims_as_set
+from xarray.core.utils import is_dict_like, is_scalar, parse_dims_as_set, result_name
 from xarray.core.variable import Variable
 from xarray.namedarray.parallelcompat import get_chunked_array_type
 from xarray.namedarray.pycompat import is_chunked_array
@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@
     MissingCoreDimOptions = Literal["raise", "copy", "drop"]
 
 _NO_FILL_VALUE = utils.ReprObject("<no-fill-value>")
-_DEFAULT_NAME = utils.ReprObject("<default-name>")
 _JOINS_WITHOUT_FILL_VALUES = frozenset({"inner", "exact"})
 
 
@@ -186,18 +185,6 @@ def _enumerate(dim):
         return str(alt_signature)
 
 
-def result_name(objects: Iterable[Any]) -> Any:
-    # use the same naming heuristics as pandas:
-    # https://github.com/blaze/blaze/issues/458#issuecomment-51936356
-    names = {getattr(obj, "name", _DEFAULT_NAME) for obj in objects}
-    names.discard(_DEFAULT_NAME)
-    if len(names) == 1:
-        (name,) = names
-    else:
-        name = None
-    return name
-
-
 def _get_coords_list(args: Iterable[Any]) -> list[Coordinates]:
     coords_list = []
     for arg in args:

xarray/core/dataarray.py

@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
     either_dict_or_kwargs,
     hashable,
     infix_dims,
+    result_name,
 )
 from xarray.core.variable import (
     IndexVariable,
@@ -4726,15 +4727,6 @@ def identical(self, other: Self) -> bool:
         except (TypeError, AttributeError):
             return False
 
-    def _result_name(self, other: Any = None) -> Hashable | None:
-        # use the same naming heuristics as pandas:
-        # https://github.com/ContinuumIO/blaze/issues/458#issuecomment-51936356
-        other_name = getattr(other, "name", _default)
-        if other_name is _default or other_name == self.name:
-            return self.name
-        else:
-            return None
-
     def __array_wrap__(self, obj, context=None) -> Self:
         new_var = self.variable.__array_wrap__(obj, context)
         return self._replace(new_var)
@@ -4782,7 +4774,7 @@ def _binary_op(
             else f(other_variable_or_arraylike, self.variable)
         )
         coords, indexes = self.coords._merge_raw(other_coords, reflexive)
-        name = self._result_name(other)
+        name = result_name([self, other])
 
         return self._replace(variable, coords, name, indexes=indexes)