-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
auditwheel repair should not fail on pure Python wheels #47
Comments
Yeah, it would be good to fix this. Pull requests welcome. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Philippe Ombredanne <
-Robert |
Looks like the wheel in question that failed was the six wheel. We don't currently have any tests for auditwheel repair on pure wheels. Let's add one to |
Hello, not sure if this is a regression, but auditwheel/src/auditwheel/main_repair.py Line 130 in 2db64bf
Is this normal? Or it's a regression? (Quite annoying for me because I want to run the repair as a job in the CI, that can build pure python wheel or wheels with binary extensions and I'd love to avoid adding logic to avoid the pipeline to fail for former cases). |
... IMHO it should just do nothing in this case.
I experienced this while using the manylinux docker images on Travis here https://travis-ci.org/pombreda/thirdparty-manylinux/jobs/152792412#L697
The auditwheel step fails because a six wheels had been pulled in
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: