-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
twine-upload: add a nudge for password auth #190
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -40,6 +40,13 @@ INPUT_VERIFY_METADATA="$(get-normalized-input 'verify-metadata')" | |
INPUT_SKIP_EXISTING="$(get-normalized-input 'skip-existing')" | ||
INPUT_PRINT_HASH="$(get-normalized-input 'print-hash')" | ||
|
||
PASSWORD_DEPRECATION_NUDGE="::warning title=Password-based uploads deprecated::\ | ||
Starting in 2024, PyPI will require all users to enable Two-Factor \ | ||
Authentication. This will consequently require all users to switch \ | ||
to either API tokens or Trusted Publishers (preferred) for package \ | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Since this is GitHub Actions we're warning in, let's put Trusted Publishers only, similar to the "Trusted Publishers" nudge? (Do we have a link to API keys for folks using reusable workflows in the TP docs?) Also, is this message worthy of an There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, this was my only lingering concern -- by nudging TP only, we might confuse some users of reusable workflows who can't switch yet. The reusable workflow limitation is documented, but not super prominently: https://docs.pypi.org/trusted-publishers/troubleshooting/#reusable-workflows-on-github So TL;DR no strong opinion from me -- if you'd rather not mention API tokens here that SGTM, but we should probably be prepared for a ~few users being confused 🙂
I believe it just makes the message red, so There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Whoops, this completely fell off my stack. Making these suggested changes now! |
||
uploads. Read more: \ | ||
https://blog.pypi.org/posts/2023-05-25-securing-pypi-with-2fa/" | ||
|
||
TRUSTED_PUBLISHING_NUDGE="::warning title=Upgrade to Trusted Publishing::\ | ||
Trusted Publishers allows publishing packages to PyPI from automated \ | ||
environments like GitHub Actions without needing to use username/password \ | ||
|
@@ -69,6 +76,7 @@ else | |
"against ${INPUT_REPOSITORY_URL}" | ||
|
||
if [[ "${INPUT_REPOSITORY_URL}" =~ pypi\.org ]]; then | ||
echo "${PASSWORD_DEPRECATION_NUDGE}" | ||
echo "${TRUSTED_PUBLISHING_NUDGE}" | ||
fi | ||
fi | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@woodruffw FYI looks like it's time to drop that future tense from the error message. So I filed #233 for when somebody gets to it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Progress! 😄
I'll go ahead and do it now, since it's a tiny change 🙂