Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Appveyor tests failing (CryptoGen) #851

Open
jaraco opened this issue Nov 18, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Appveyor tests failing (CryptoGen) #851

jaraco opened this issue Nov 18, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
Needs Triage Issues that need to be evaluated for severity and status.

Comments

@jaraco
Copy link
Member

jaraco commented Nov 18, 2016

A recent test invoking subprocesses has started causing failures in AppVeyor such as this one.
jaraco added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 18, 2016
@jaraco
Add environment variable to detect APPVEYOR. Ref #851.
b4d7715
jaraco added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 18, 2016
@jaraco
Skip failing test on appveyor until the cause can be uncovered. Ref #851
e8d53c0 
.
@jayvdb jayvdb mentioned this issue Nov 26, 2016
Closed
@jaraco
Copy link
Member Author

jaraco commented Dec 12, 2016

Apparently this is an issue with python affecting virtualenv and thus tox although these invocations are all using the same sys.executable, so it's not yet clear to me how precisely these issues are implicated.

jaraco added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2016
@jaraco
Mark another test to fail. Ref #851
8c055ff
@jaraco jaraco mentioned this issue Nov 20, 2017
Open
@jaraco jaraco mentioned this issue Sep 16, 2018
Merged
2 tasks
@pganssle pganssle added the Needs Triage Issues that need to be evaluated for severity and status. label Oct 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Needs Triage Issues that need to be evaluated for severity and status.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jaraco @pganssle