-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update infrastructure #174
Conversation
@martinfleis should we go ahead and make the switch from |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #174 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 72.91% 49.87% -23.05%
===========================================
Files 20 14 -6
Lines 1045 786 -259
===========================================
- Hits 762 392 -370
- Misses 283 394 +111
|
If you simply replace it, then you need to pin geopandas to 0.13 or newer. You can do it conditionally based on the version but not sure if we need to go that far. But yeah, it would be nice to do something about it to silence the warning. |
Do we think these differences can be simply attributes to precision? Seems a bit high for that.
|
not sure what it is. Agree too high to be precision, and too odd that it's only windows. I'm not terribly worried though. Those aren't really appropriate interpolators anyway. They were highly experimental when we put them in and havent had time to return to them. I'm confident nobody is actually using those |
Seems very likely the failures is directly related to |
any chance there's like a |
You could:
|
ok, skipif(platform.system()=='Windows') would be easy but i think its better to just xfail here. Good refs, thanks |
No description provided.