-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add some benchmark tests #37
Comments
Some other options to investigate: |
goodboy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 5, 2017
This begins an effort to incorporate run-time speed tests using `pytest-benchmark`. This initial test set audits the `_MultiCall` loop with hookimpls, hookwrappers and the combination of both. The intention is to eventually have a reliable set of tests which enable making core component modifications without disrupting performance as per #37.
goodboy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 5, 2017
This begins an effort to incorporate run-time speed tests using `pytest-benchmark`. This initial test set audits the `_MultiCall` loop with hookimpls, hookwrappers and the combination of both. The intention is to eventually have a reliable set of tests which enable making core component modifications without disrupting performance as per #37.
goodboy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 5, 2017
This begins an effort to incorporate run-time speed tests using `pytest-benchmark`. This initial test set audits the `_MultiCall` loop with hookimpls, hookwrappers and the combination of both. The intention is to eventually have a reliable set of tests which enable making core component modifications without disrupting performance as per #37.
goodboy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 5, 2017
This begins an effort to incorporate run-time speed tests using `pytest-benchmark`. This initial test set audits the `_MultiCall` loop with hookimpls, hookwrappers and the combination of both. The intention is to eventually have a reliable set of tests which enable making core component modifications without disrupting performance as per #37.
goodboy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 5, 2017
This begins an effort to incorporate run-time speed tests using `pytest-benchmark`. This initial test set audits the `_MultiCall` loop with hookimpls, hookwrappers and the combination of both. The intention is to eventually have a reliable set of tests which enable making core component modifications without disrupting performance as per #37.
goodboy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 7, 2017
This begins an effort to incorporate run-time speed tests using `pytest-benchmark`. This initial test set audits the `_MultiCall` loop with hookimpls, hookwrappers and the combination of both. The intention is to eventually have a reliable set of tests which enable making core component modifications without disrupting performance as per #37.
goodboy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 7, 2017
This begins an effort to incorporate run-time speed tests using `pytest-benchmark`. This initial test set audits the `_MultiCall` loop with hookimpls, hookwrappers and the combination of both. The intention is to eventually have a reliable set of tests which enable making core component modifications without disrupting performance as per #37.
There was recently a post on the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There's been some discussion (#15, #23) surrounding performance mostly as it pertains to the
_Multicall.execute()
loop.I propose we add some tests which use pytest-benchmark or something similar to audit changes we make to critical code paths. This encourages being objective about future changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: