Support RGBA TIFF with missing ExtraSamples tag #393
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I think we should support it. Worst case is that we'll incorrectly read an image that we would have rejected outright. |
|
+1 |
aclark4life
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2013
Support RGBA TIFF with missing ExtraSamples tag
radarhere
pushed a commit
to radarhere/Pillow
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2023
Updated libjpeg-turbo to 3.0.0
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19582526/pillow-cannot-read-different-tiff-files
Pillow can not identify TIFF files that contain valid RGBA images but don't contain the
ExtraSamplestag (as required by the TIFF specification). The question is whether Pillow should support this case?