-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure TypeVarIds are unique #11657
Ensure TypeVarIds are unique #11657
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Analysis of mypy primer: (Also I didn't get any of the differences in generic formatting things I expected due to the tests, neat) I believe these errors are because I think this is the correct behaviour: if the typevars in the generic were flipped, I believe the mypy without this PR would complain which is not good behaviour. (Not at a computer to check) Edits needed to make work: index b7bf2ce..ef87d05 100644
--- a/rich/_lru_cache.py
+++ b/rich/_lru_cache.py
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ CacheKey = TypeVar("CacheKey")
CacheValue = TypeVar("CacheValue")
-class LRUCache(Generic[CacheKey, CacheValue], OrderedDict): # type: ignore # https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/6904
+class LRUCache(Generic[CacheKey, CacheValue], OrderedDict[CacheKey, CacheValue]): # https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/6904
"""
A dictionary-like container that stores a given maximum items.
@@ -24,11 +24,11 @@ class LRUCache(Generic[CacheKey, CacheValue], OrderedDict): # type: ignore # ht
if key not in self:
if len(self) >= self.cache_size:
self.popitem(last=False)
- OrderedDict.__setitem__(self, key, value)
+ super().__setitem__(key, value)
- def __getitem__(self: Dict[CacheKey, CacheValue], key: CacheKey) -> CacheValue:
+ def __getitem__(self, key: CacheKey) -> CacheValue:
"""Gets the item, but also makes it most recent."""
- value: CacheValue = OrderedDict.__getitem__(self, key)
- OrderedDict.__delitem__(self, key)
- OrderedDict.__setitem__(self, key, value)
+ value: CacheValue = super().__getitem__(key)
+ super().__delitem__(key)
+ super().__setitem__(key, value)
return value I believe this is OK. My instinct is that this is because The error message sucks though. I think it should have the typevar ids? But out of scope... --- a/src/websockets/legacy/protocol.py
+++ b/src/websockets/legacy/protocol.py
@@ -679,13 +679,11 @@ class WebSocketCommonProtocol(asyncio.Protocol):
elif isinstance(message, AsyncIterable):
# aiter_message = aiter(message) without aiter
# https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/5738
- aiter_message = type(message).__aiter__(message) # type: ignore
+ aiter_message = message.__aiter__()
try:
# message_chunk = anext(aiter_message) without anext
# https://github.com/python/mypy/issues/5738
- message_chunk = await type(aiter_message).__anext__( # type: ignore
- aiter_message
- )
+ message_chunk = await aiter_message.__anext__()
except StopAsyncIteration:
return
opcode, data = prepare_data(message_chunk) I... Don't know why the code was doing Tanjun: nice to see the project I'm trying to make compatible with mypy shows up here, the issue was extracted from it :-) |
The fix for this is *really* hacky, but whatever.
5cf7899
to
c85fe85
Compare
Diff from mypy_primer, showing the effect of this PR on open source code: rich (https://github.com/willmcgugan/rich)
+ rich/_lru_cache.py:27: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "CacheKey", target has type "_KT")
+ rich/_lru_cache.py:27: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "CacheValue", target has type "_VT")
+ rich/_lru_cache.py:31: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "_VT", variable has type "CacheValue")
+ rich/_lru_cache.py:31: error: Invalid index type "Dict[CacheKey, CacheValue]" for "dict"; expected type "Dict[_KT, _VT]"
+ rich/_lru_cache.py:31: error: Invalid index type "CacheKey" for "dict"; expected type "_KT"
+ rich/_lru_cache.py:32: error: Argument 1 to "__delitem__" of "dict" has incompatible type "Dict[CacheKey, CacheValue]"; expected "Dict[_KT, _VT]"
+ rich/_lru_cache.py:32: error: Argument 2 to "__delitem__" of "dict" has incompatible type "CacheKey"; expected "_KT"
+ rich/_lru_cache.py:33: error: Invalid index type "Dict[CacheKey, CacheValue]" for "dict"; expected type "Dict[_KT, _VT]"
+ rich/_lru_cache.py:33: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "CacheKey", target has type "_KT")
+ rich/_lru_cache.py:33: error: Incompatible types in assignment (expression has type "CacheValue", target has type "_VT")
Tanjun (https://github.com/FasterSpeeding/Tanjun)
- tanjun/abc.py:2268: error: Signature of "copy" incompatible with supertype "ExecutableCommand"
- tanjun/abc.py:2268: note: Superclass:
- tanjun/abc.py:2268: note: def copy(self) -> MessageCommand[MessageContext]
- tanjun/abc.py:2268: note: Subclass:
- tanjun/abc.py:2268: note: def copy(self, *, parent: Optional[MessageCommandGroup[Any]] = ...) -> MessageCommand[CommandCallbackSigT]
- tanjun/commands.py:1143: error: Return type "SlashCommand[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]" of "bind_client" incompatible with return type "SlashCommand[SlashContext]" in supertype "PartialCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:1143: error: Return type "SlashCommand[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]" of "bind_client" incompatible with return type "SlashCommand[SlashContext]" in supertype "ExecutableCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:1945: error: Signature of "copy" incompatible with supertype "PartialCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:1945: note: Superclass:
- tanjun/commands.py:1945: note: def copy(self, *, _new: bool = ...) -> SlashCommand[SlashContext]
- tanjun/commands.py:1945: note: Subclass:
- tanjun/commands.py:1945: note: def copy(self, *, _new: bool = ..., parent: Optional[SlashCommandGroup] = ...) -> SlashCommand[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]
- tanjun/commands.py:1945: error: Signature of "copy" incompatible with supertype "ExecutableCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:1945: note: def copy(self) -> SlashCommand[SlashContext]
- tanjun/commands.py:1945: note: def copy(self, *, _new: bool = ..., parent: Optional[SlashCommandGroup] = ...) -> SlashCommand[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]
- tanjun/commands.py:2080: error: Return type "MessageCommand[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]" of "bind_client" incompatible with return type "MessageCommand[MessageContext]" in supertype "PartialCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:2080: error: Return type "MessageCommand[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]" of "bind_client" incompatible with return type "MessageCommand[MessageContext]" in supertype "ExecutableCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:2088: error: Return type "MessageCommand[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]" of "bind_component" incompatible with return type "MessageCommand[MessageContext]" in supertype "PartialCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:2088: error: Return type "MessageCommand[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]" of "bind_component" incompatible with return type "MessageCommand[MessageContext]" in supertype "ExecutableCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:2096: error: Signature of "copy" incompatible with supertype "PartialCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:2096: note: Superclass:
- tanjun/commands.py:2096: note: def copy(self, *, _new: bool = ...) -> MessageCommand[MessageContext]
- tanjun/commands.py:2096: note: Subclass:
- tanjun/commands.py:2096: note: def copy(self, *, parent: Optional[MessageCommandGroup[Any]] = ..., _new: bool = ...) -> MessageCommand[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]
- tanjun/commands.py:2096: error: Signature of "copy" incompatible with supertype "ExecutableCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:2096: note: def copy(self) -> MessageCommand[MessageContext]
- tanjun/commands.py:2096: note: def copy(self, *, parent: Optional[MessageCommandGroup[Any]] = ..., _new: bool = ...) -> MessageCommand[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]
- tanjun/commands.py:2221: error: Signature of "copy" incompatible with supertype "PartialCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:2221: note: Superclass:
- tanjun/commands.py:2221: note: def copy(self, *, _new: bool = ...) -> MessageCommandGroup[MessageContext]
- tanjun/commands.py:2221: note: Subclass:
- tanjun/commands.py:2221: note: def copy(self, *, parent: Optional[MessageCommandGroup[Any]] = ..., _new: bool = ...) -> MessageCommandGroup[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]
- tanjun/commands.py:2221: error: Signature of "copy" incompatible with supertype "ExecutableCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:2221: note: def copy(self) -> MessageCommandGroup[MessageContext]
- tanjun/commands.py:2221: note: def copy(self, *, parent: Optional[MessageCommandGroup[Any]] = ..., _new: bool = ...) -> MessageCommandGroup[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]
- tanjun/commands.py:2291: error: Return type "MessageCommandGroup[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]" of "bind_client" incompatible with return type "MessageCommandGroup[MessageContext]" in supertype "PartialCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:2291: error: Return type "MessageCommandGroup[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]" of "bind_client" incompatible with return type "MessageCommandGroup[MessageContext]" in supertype "ExecutableCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:2299: error: Return type "MessageCommandGroup[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]" of "bind_component" incompatible with return type "MessageCommandGroup[MessageContext]" in supertype "PartialCommand"
- tanjun/commands.py:2299: error: Return type "MessageCommandGroup[abc.CommandCallbackSigT]" of "bind_component" incompatible with return type "MessageCommandGroup[MessageContext]" in supertype "ExecutableCommand"
websockets (https://github.com/aaugustin/websockets)
+ src/websockets/legacy/protocol.py:687: error: Argument 1 to "__anext__" of "AsyncIterator" has incompatible type "AsyncIterator[_T_co]"; expected "AsyncIterator[_T_co]"
|
Description
Closes #11605
This PR makes it so that TypeVarIds have to be unique among the class / superclasses. Other parts of mypy use this as a unique identifier (for instance
expandtype.py
has a visitor that has said assumption). This change makes this work!Test Plan
I added the case that didn't work for me, but I would recommend looking at the code closely as this fix seems really... icky.
Also, mypy-primer's output is going to be terribly long because of the difference in generic representation :(