-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sphinx - RSS #1934
Sphinx - RSS #1934
Conversation
a82ddc8
to
c46ce31
Compare
@AA-Turner This needs rebasing or closing? |
Rebased |
@AA-Turner What's the best way to test this? |
|
Just found https://validator.w3.org/feed/#validate_by_input, seems that the spec only supports one author entry per item, will ammend. (edit: for future ref, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5855993/multiple-authors-in-rss-or-atoms) |
@pablogsal fixed author issues (W3C validator not entirely happy as it expects only one author, but the spec is silent on this and the SO answer above seemed to confirm that there is no best way to deal with this). |
See #2, #1385 for context.
This is the RSS generation part, building on PR #1930. It contains the logic for generating RSS