Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PEP 677: Use PEP 646 syntax when discussing unpack #2216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2022

Conversation

stroxler
Copy link
Contributor

@stroxler stroxler commented Jan 8, 2022

I'd intended to make this update everywhere in an earlier PR, but missed this line.

I'd intended to fix this based on feedback in an earlier PR, but missed
it.
@stroxler stroxler requested a review from gvanrossum as a code owner January 8, 2022 01:13
@gvanrossum gvanrossum merged commit 557696d into python:main Jan 8, 2022
@@ -468,8 +468,8 @@ evaluate the AST form::
Name("bool")
)

and be treated by type checkers as equivalent to
``Callable[[int, Unpack[Ts]], bool]``.
and be treated by type checkers as equivalent to or ``Callable[[int,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to or

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants