Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PEP 682: Fix pre-commit issue with backticks #2316

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2022
Merged

PEP 682: Fix pre-commit issue with backticks #2316

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2022

Conversation

vstinner
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner commented Feb 8, 2022

No description provided.

@vstinner vstinner requested a review from mdickinson as a code owner February 8, 2022 17:41
@vstinner vstinner merged commit 1ef98b3 into python:main Feb 8, 2022
@vstinner vstinner deleted the pep682_backtick branch February 8, 2022 17:43
@mdickinson
Copy link
Member

LGTM!

@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

vstinner commented Feb 8, 2022

Ah thanks for the review :-) It seems like the PEP was written before a Lint CI was added to the repo, so it was possible to merge the PR even if the Lint CI job failed. This PR fix the job, so I was able to merge my PEP 7 about static inline functions ;-)

@AA-Turner
Copy link
Member

Thanks Victor -- I made a commit to fix this but evidently didn't push it!

A

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants