PEP 678: Update proposal with .add_note() and acknowledgements section
#2331
Conversation
CAM-Gerlach
changed the title
.add_note() and acknowledgements section.add_note() and acknowledgements section
|
Currently working on reviewing this, thanks. I will also have fixes for the issues causing the build failures on both rendering systems. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a few minor suggestions to fix the syntax issues causing build failures on both rendering systems, resolve a few grammar problems, improve a bit of syntax and refine a few of @iritkatriel 's suggestions from a textual perspective.
As always, for any you'd like to apply, I suggest using the Add to batch button in the Files tab and then committing with the Commit button at the top. Thanks!
Co-authored-by: Irit Katriel <1055913+iritkatriel@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
Just replied over there; I do anticipate another PR before we go back to the Steering Council. (the discussions will continue until morale improves!) |
|
I do like your latest proposal :) |
|
The process is definitely producing a better proposal, and I'll also be happy when I'm done - mostly because I want to use it 😉 |
…ion (python#2331) Co-authored-by: Irit Katriel <1055913+iritkatriel@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
|
There is a cost to adding another key to BaseException’s dict. In any case, I don’t think this point needs to be resolved before resubmitting to the SC. It is very minor. |
Without recapping the diff, further discussion of translating messages on discuss.python.org prompted this updated design, which handles multiple notes by way of representing a sequence, rather than concatenating strings.
It is also, while I do anticipate further expansion, high time for an acknowledgements section.