PEP 572: Typo, parenthesize -> parentheses #2370
Conversation
|
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). CLA MissingOur records indicate the following people have not signed the CLA: For legal reasons we need all the people listed to sign the CLA before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received. Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it! |
|
Huh, yup, that looks like a typo, or possibly an editing issue (could have been "require parenthesized expressions" or something). 👍 |
| @@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ The less confusing option is to make ``:=`` bind more tightly than comma. | |||
| Always requiring parentheses | |||
| ---------------------------- | |||
|
|
|||
| It's been proposed to just always require parenthesize around an | |||
| It's been proposed to just always require parentheses around an | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good suggestions! Since this pull request just got merged, I'll make a separate pull request for these changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we can skip these changes, since the existing text is suboptimal but not wrong. We should mostly avoid changes to finalized PEPs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"It's" can also be a contraction for "it has" (e.g., https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/it%27s#Etymology_1, https://www.grammarly.com/blog/its-vs-its/#:~:text=It's%20is%20a%20contraction%20of,to%20or%20refers%20to%20something.).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current "It's" text is fine. It's just the parenthesis/parenthesize that is unambiguously wrong.
Thanks! In any event, I actually just signed the CLA, I guess it'll take some time for it to show up though. For the next pull request :) |
| @@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ The less confusing option is to make ``:=`` bind more tightly than comma. | |||
| Always requiring parentheses | |||
| ---------------------------- | |||
|
|
|||
| It's been proposed to just always require parenthesize around an | |||
| It's been proposed to just always require parentheses around an | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good suggestions! Since this pull request just got merged, I'll make a separate pull request for these changes.
Changing typo from "parenthesize" to "parentheses".