Style: Fix vertical margins of def lists w/o <p>s to match those with #2427
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In #2300 , it was reported that the vertical margin varies substantially between entries with multiple paragraphs (i.e, another
<p>
element) and those that only have one (i.e. just text, no<p>
). Furthermore, the margins are still pretty tight as @pradyunsg reported, making them uncomfortable to read; they should be at least equivalent to the normal margin between paragraph-level elements.PEP 639 is a canonical example without and with this PR.
This resolves both of those concerns by just ensuring that
dl dd
(except headers and footnotes, which are already overridden) have the same0.5rem
bottom vertical margin as paragraphs do:@pradyunsg Are there any additional vertical line spacing concerns you'd like me to address at this time?
Resolves #2300