Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PEP 686: Update based on discussion #2446

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 22, 2022
Merged

PEP 686: Update based on discussion #2446

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 22, 2022

Conversation

methane
Copy link
Member

@methane methane commented Mar 19, 2022

No description provided.

@methane methane requested a review from zooba March 19, 2022 02:51
@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach changed the title PEP 686: Update based on discussion. PEP 686: Update based on discussion Mar 19, 2022
@methane methane requested review from CAM-Gerlach and ncoghlan March 20, 2022 03:05
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ UTF-8 becomes de-facto standard text encoding.
default.
* Most websites and text data on the internet uses UTF-8.
* And many other popular programming languages including node.js, Go, Rust,
Ruby, and Java uses UTF-8 by default.
and Java uses UTF-8 by default.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed Ruby here because Ruby still uses locale encoding on Unix.

Copy link
Member

@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM from a technical/PEP 12 perspective, thanks. If you'd like me to help copyedit/proofread the text for grammar, etc, I'm happy to do so (it would probably be best to do so as a separate PR for your review once this is merged); just let me know.

@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor

This update cleanly addresses the concern I raised on Discourse.

@methane methane merged commit 04eb449 into python:main Mar 22, 2022
@methane
Copy link
Member Author

methane commented Mar 22, 2022

Thank you for review. I merge this for now to continue more discussions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants