Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DRY refactoring #60
DRY refactoring #60
Changes from 26 commits
0be276d
d287bdb
135780c
d5196c2
773c9ba
f199189
6fd27d2
2ba2bc6
b740b0d
01d2f3d
537cc7e
6dffa20
1117f5a
65a04ca
715716e
b6fde09
7f7a6ef
70301a6
b889ec3
fe186de
3df5f25
547d3d1
b2e48a6
2f638b0
3e788ec
5784752
1c8f792
d9a6efa
0d82aee
8392d24
f3779cd
3d5a223
245effb
1c1e762
b2840f2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the plan to remove seqpro_mf?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's an easy enough change on this side of things, and a little bit of refactoring for metapool package. I can make the change by the end of the week in between other things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like at the end of each method something similar to this line is called, should it be more general? I mean something like
self.failed_samples_audit('ConvertJob')
where that calls something likeself.write(job.audit(self.pipeline.get_sample_ids()), audit_name)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried this out, but it seems like it will just create another function something like the following:
def _failed_samples_audit(self, job, step_name):
self.fsr.write(job.audit(self.pipeline.get_sample_ids()), step_name)
It doesn't really do much. The meat of each audit is in each Job class, while the structure and writing of each failed samples record is in the FailedSamplesRecord class.