You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With the addition of metadata for the Spring metadata format, we end up with the confusing sourceClass/sourceType, with sourceClass being what we push to the Spring metadata sourceType in the end.
This is very confusion, we need to fix it.
Implementation ideas
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the light of the Spring config metadata, let's get rid of sourceClass
and let's avoid using sourceType for the field/method type as it's
confusing.
Fixesquarkusio#43175
gsmet
added a commit
to gsmet/quarkus
that referenced
this issue
Sep 13, 2024
In the light of the Spring config metadata, let's get rid of sourceClass
and let's avoid using sourceType for the field/method type as it's
confusing.
Fixesquarkusio#43175
gsmet
added a commit
to gsmet/quarkus
that referenced
this issue
Sep 13, 2024
In the light of the Spring config metadata, let's get rid of sourceClass
and let's avoid using sourceType for the field/method type as it's
confusing.
Fixesquarkusio#43175
gsmet
added a commit
to gsmet/quarkus
that referenced
this issue
Sep 30, 2024
In the light of the Spring config metadata, let's get rid of sourceClass
and let's avoid using sourceType for the field/method type as it's
confusing.
Fixesquarkusio#43175
Description
With the addition of metadata for the Spring metadata format, we end up with the confusing
sourceClass
/sourceType
, withsourceClass
being what we push to the Spring metadatasourceType
in the end.This is very confusion, we need to fix it.
Implementation ideas
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: