Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rj/miniconf #374

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 4, 2021
Merged

rj/miniconf #374

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 4, 2021

Conversation

jordens
Copy link
Member

@jordens jordens commented Jun 1, 2021

  • miniconf.py: make retain an option
  • miniconf: add some checks, simplify

@jordens jordens requested a review from ryan-summers June 1, 2021 16:34
Copy link
Member

@ryan-summers ryan-summers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One minor doc update. Otherwise, LGTM. Definitely makes sense to use just a raw int for now, and we can always change in the future if we want more complex correlation data, since that's all at our layer and unrelated to the firmware (whatever we send gets echo'd).

miniconf.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jordens
Copy link
Member Author

jordens commented Jun 4, 2021

bors merge

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jun 4, 2021

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot merged commit 387e9f1 into master Jun 4, 2021
@bors bors bot deleted the rj/miniconf branch June 4, 2021 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants