Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Roadmap-and-Backlog.md #991

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 11, 2021
Merged

Conversation

kniz-raft
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Updated to reflect ATO and potential Release 3 scope

Value Delivered: Get approval for the authority to operate and create a production environment.

| Outcome | Status |
| -------- | ------- |
| User can log in using login.gov | Complete
| Users with appropriate privileges can manage users | Complete
| Users can upload data files by section and quarter | Complete
| Users with appropriate privileges can download files that were previously uploaded | In Progress
|Create production environment | Will happen after ATO
| Users with appropriate privileges can download files that were previously uploaded | Complete
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

which issue is this associated with?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#416 I believe - but if that's incorrect, we can remove it for now.


## Release 1 (fka OFA MVP) Scope
Value Delivered: ACF employees can use a secure method to log into the system; this would require a PIV card.
Value Delivered: ACF employees can use a secure method to log into the system; this would require a PIV/CAC card.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to mention anything about the implementation of secret key prevention? it's definitely valuable in that this is providing reassurance about the security of TDP, but I understand if we want to focus primarily on user-facing outcomes.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, absolutely. I'll add some language in.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ADPennington ADPennington left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good! just had a few questions @kniz-raft

@kniz-raft kniz-raft requested a review from ADPennington June 3, 2021 19:06
Copy link
Collaborator

@ADPennington ADPennington left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @kniz-raft LGTM! cc: @lfrohlich

@andrew-jameson andrew-jameson merged commit e1b3cb6 into raft-tdp-main Jun 11, 2021
@andrew-jameson andrew-jameson deleted the kniz-raft-patch-1 branch June 11, 2021 22:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants