Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade coveralls from 3.0.9 to 3.1.0 #28

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 29, 2020

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade coveralls from 3.0.9 to 3.1.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.
  • The recommended version is 6 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 4 days ago, on 2020-04-24.
Release notes
Package name: coveralls
  • 3.1.0 - 2020-04-24
    • Handle service_job_number for parallelism in Travis and CircleCI (#290) 705c3b5
    • Update sinon to v7.5.0. (#288) eb6dc35

    v3.0.14...v3.1.0


    This is a minor release due to the change in behavior for CircleCI, which now uses the Workflow ID to merge parallel coverage jobs:

        options.service_number = process.env.CIRCLE_WORKFLOW_ID;
        options.service_job_number = process.env.CIRCLE_BUILD_NUM;
  • 3.0.14 - 2020-04-23
  • 3.0.13 - 2020-04-21

    remove redundant code (#283)

    The check is already done above.

  • 3.0.12 - 2020-04-21

    3.0.12

  • 3.0.11 - 2020-03-19

    Improved:

    • If COVERALLS_SERVICE_NUMBER is set, set service_number from it. (@midgleyc)
  • 3.0.10 - 2020-03-19

    Added:

    • CodeFresh support (@suda)

    Improved:

    Updated:

  • 3.0.9 - 2019-11-26
    • removed Istanbul, mocha dependencies
    • reverted cobertura-parse support (package dependency archived)
    • removed snyk (automated security updates from GitHub via Dependabot enabled)
    • improved Windows support
from coveralls GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: coveralls

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@pull-assistant
Copy link

Score: 1.00

Best reviewed: commit by commit


Optimal code review plan

     fix: upgrade coveralls from 3.0.9 to 3.1.0

     fix: upgrade coveralls from 3.0.9 to 3.1.0

Powered by Pull Assistant. Last update d192bd6 ... ae352aa. Read the comment docs.

@codeclimate
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Apr 29, 2020

Code Climate has analyzed commit ae352aa and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 100.0% (0.0% change).

View more on Code Climate.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 29, 2020

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 263

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 242: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 68
Relevant Lines: 68

💛 - Coveralls

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 29, 2020

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 263

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 242: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 68
Relevant Lines: 68

💛 - Coveralls

@randytarampi randytarampi merged commit 100efed into master Apr 29, 2020
@randytarampi randytarampi deleted the snyk-upgrade-def8d5277ac4c28adbf1460226d0cd6b branch April 29, 2020 17:40
@randytarampi
Copy link
Owner

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.13.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants