-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 199
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Field name standardization #350
Conversation
|
||
`fields.txt` defines the various fields (`os.vendor`, etc.) used to assert | ||
information about a match. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The above is the only real change to this file. The rest are just formatting.
<param pos="1" name="hw.product.model"/> | ||
<param pos="0" name="hw.product" value="TemPageR {hw.product.model}"/> | ||
<param pos="1" name="hw.model"/> | ||
<param pos="0" name="hw.product" value="TemPageR {hw.model}"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hdm - RE: These two fingerprints - you added these a while back. I've changed hw.product.model
to hw.model
to be in keeping with the use of hw.model
used elsewhere. Any concerns here?
@@ -2766,7 +2766,7 @@ | |||
<param pos="0" name="hw.certainty" value="0.75"/> | |||
<param pos="0" name="os.vendor" value="Dell"/> | |||
<param pos="0" name="os.product" value="iDRAC Linux"/> | |||
<param pos="0" name="os .certainty" value="0.75"/> | |||
<param pos="0" name="os.certainty" value="0.75"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Already paying off..
@hdm - in light of the |
Nice work! |
Description
This PR adds field names (
os.vendor
,service.product
, etc) tobin/recog_standarize
. This should help us identify field name typos as well as be a bit more intentional when we introduce a new field.How Has This Been Tested?
ruby bin/recog_standardize xml/*.xml
, rspec, etc.Types of changes
Checklist: