Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use isinstance over is_foo_dtype internally #14638

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023
Merged

Use isinstance over is_foo_dtype internally #14638

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

mroeschke
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Internally IMO we should prefer isinstance over is_*_dtype when we know the input is a dtype instance in order to be stricter/faster that the is_*_dtype checks

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

@mroeschke mroeschke added Python Affects Python cuDF API. improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Dec 15, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke requested a review from a team as a code owner December 15, 2023 00:57
@mroeschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit cbcfa67 into rapidsai:branch-24.02 Dec 15, 2023
67 checks passed
@mroeschke mroeschke deleted the cln/is_foo_dtype branch December 15, 2023 21:06
@mroeschke mroeschke mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2023
Merged
3 tasks
rapids-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2024
@mroeschke
Use instance over is_foo_dtype (#14641)
f785ed3 
Similar to #14638, use isinstance when we know we are checking a dtype instance

Authors:
  - Matthew Roeschke (https://github.com/mroeschke)
  - Vyas Ramasubramani (https://github.com/vyasr)

Approvers:
  - Vyas Ramasubramani (https://github.com/vyasr)

URL: #14641
@AntiKnot AntiKnot mentioned this pull request Aug 23, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@shwina shwina shwina approved these changes

@galipremsagar galipremsagar Awaiting requested review from galipremsagar galipremsagar is a code owner automatically assigned from rapidsai/cudf-python-codeowners

@isVoid isVoid Awaiting requested review from isVoid isVoid is a code owner automatically assigned from rapidsai/cudf-python-codeowners

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change Python Affects Python cuDF API.
Projects
cuDF/Dask/Numba/UCX
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@mroeschke @shwina