Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relax inconsistent schema handling in dask_cudf.read_parquet #17554

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: branch-25.02
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rjzamora
Copy link
Member

@rjzamora rjzamora commented Dec 9, 2024

Description

Addresses an issue raised offline by @praateekmahajan

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

@rjzamora rjzamora added bug Something isn't working 2 - In Progress Currently a work in progress dask Dask issue non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Dec 9, 2024
@rjzamora rjzamora self-assigned this Dec 9, 2024
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Python Affects Python cuDF API. label Dec 9, 2024
@rjzamora
Copy link
Member Author

rjzamora commented Dec 9, 2024

/ok to test

@rjzamora rjzamora marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2024 02:38
@rjzamora rjzamora requested a review from a team as a code owner December 11, 2024 02:38
@rjzamora rjzamora added 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team and removed 2 - In Progress Currently a work in progress labels Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team bug Something isn't working dask Dask issue non-breaking Non-breaking change Python Affects Python cuDF API.
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants