Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOC] shap explainer npermutations is documented wrongly #4047

Closed
pseudotensor opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4402
Closed

[DOC] shap explainer npermutations is documented wrongly #4047

pseudotensor opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4402
Assignees
Labels
? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify doc Documentation inactive-90d

Comments

@pseudotensor
Copy link

says The l1 regularization to use for feature selection which is not right.

https://docs.rapids.ai/api/cuml/nightly/api.html#model-explainability

https://shap-lrjball.readthedocs.io/en/latest/generated/shap.PermutationExplainer.html

@pseudotensor pseudotensor added ? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify doc Documentation labels Jul 12, 2021
@dantegd dantegd self-assigned this Jul 12, 2021
@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented Jul 12, 2021

Thanks for noticing! While re-reading I noticed a few other things that need updating there, so will fix them this week.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been labeled inactive-90d due to no recent activity in the past 90 days. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed.

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot closed this as completed in #4402 Dec 6, 2021
rapids-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2021
vimarsh6739 pushed a commit to vimarsh6739/cuml that referenced this issue Oct 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
? - Needs Triage Need team to review and classify doc Documentation inactive-90d
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants