-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
media: bcm2835-isp: fix bytes per line calculations for some image fo… #3645
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not entirely sure, but I would guess the upstream folks might object to using align_minus_1 variable over an explicit (align - 1).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem. Given that I was using it several times I thought I'd make it explicit that I expected the value to be re-used, but if we think (a) the compiler would do it anyway and (b) upstream maintainers might object, then I'll happily change it. Is that the general feeling?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They would probably prefer you to use the existing ALIGN and IS_ALIGNED macros.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Personally I don't think we need the complication with manually working out if it's a bitmask or not.
24bpp is the only format that has quirks, and you have a near match with https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/blob/rpi-5.4.y/drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-camera/bcm2835-camera.c#L994
Admittedly it's not a performance critical path, but manually computing whether we need to do the modulo seems nuts.
MMAL sets the stride via a multiple of width * bpp. 32pixels * 24bpp is 96 bytes, which fulfils the ISP requirement for a multiple of 32 bytes. So I think we can do
and leave the bytesperline_align at 32 (or hardcode it here).
(edited - it helps to actually call the ALIGN macro)