Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use xdebug.file_link_format for class in dump #4

Open
leek opened this issue Mar 19, 2012 · 7 comments
Open

Use xdebug.file_link_format for class in dump #4

leek opened this issue Mar 19, 2012 · 7 comments

Comments

@leek
Copy link

leek commented Mar 19, 2012

It would be pretty sweet if you could use the xdebug.file_link_format (if it exists) for class names in the dump output.

@raulfraile
Copy link
Owner

I agree, it would be nice to have this option. Where do you suggest to use the link? Next to the class name or the class name itself?

@leek
Copy link
Author

leek commented Mar 20, 2012

@raulfraile I'd prefer clicking the class name since that is how it works with xDebug.

@raulfraile
Copy link
Owner

Ok, but IMO it shouldn't be activated by default as it changes "normal" behavior (currently clicking on the class name expands/collapses the var info). Don't you think @leek?

@leek
Copy link
Author

leek commented Mar 20, 2012

@raulfraile Sorry I don't notice that behavior since I set auto_expanded = true. A link next to the class name is fine also, although the expand/collapse feature is useless, IMO. 100% of the time I want it expanded.

@raulfraile
Copy link
Owner

@leek I think I should open an issue asking for feedback for setting auto_expanded = true by default. Give me a few days to make the changes for xdebug link and thank for your suggestions :)

@pierredup
Copy link
Contributor

I'm also +1 for the auto_expanded = true

@COil
Copy link
Contributor

COil commented Jan 25, 2013

👍 For auto_expanded = true

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants