Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: support run-ios on Mac target (Catalyst) #1024
feat: support run-ios on Mac target (Catalyst) #1024
Changes from 3 commits
aa13b5b
d89d51d
dd3801c
525c838
5410128
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW,
xcrun intruments -s devices
returns all simulators + connected devices, it's kinda confusing that we runxcrun simctl
few lines earlier inrunOnIOSSimulator
.I think this code could be simplified to just rely on a single code path, now that we're at it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I just realized there is another parser. I could try to simplify the code.
There is a small difference between the output of two commands on my Mac:
It seems
instruments
are a broader concept for Xcode where we can have iPhone paired with Apple Watch, compared tosimctl
. Host mac only exists ininstruments
.I will try to see if output from
instruments
is enough for booting any simulator.xcrun instruments -s devices
xcrun simctl list devices
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be safer to tackle refactoring as a separate PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked at the code and realized
xcrun simctl list devices
is commonly used because the output of it indicates the simulator availability and state. However, the output does not contain real devices asxcrun instruments -s
does.For now, I'm afraid those two commands will have to co-exist.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, thanks for investigation. If you have any ideas on how to further simplify the code, please do :)