-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add meta descriptions to top documentation #5593
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯
docs/intro/import-guide.rst
Outdated
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ | |||
Importing Your Documentation | |||
============================ | |||
|
|||
.. meta:: | |||
:description lang=en: Import your existing technical documentation from source control into Read the Docs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we should choose "source control" or "version control" -- we should pick one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Version control is probably better and I changed it to that one. The one positive of source control is that it doesn't overload the term "version" which RTD uses.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree with Eric's comment about version control.
Initially my goal here is to just have slightly better blurbs on search engine result pages (SERPs).