Improve syntactic_sugar message to be type-specific

[marcelofabri]

Fixes #1803

[SwiftLintBot]

	79 Warnings
⚠️	This PR may need tests.
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Aerial: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Aerial/Aerial/Source/Models/ManifestLoader.swift:103:82: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Aerial: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Aerial/Aerial/Source/Models/ManifestLoader.swift:106:50: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Client/Frontend/Browser/BrowserViewController.swift:939:61: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Client/Frontend/Reader/ReaderMode.swift:269:39: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Providers/PocketFeed.swift:29:33: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Providers/PocketFeed.swift:88:49: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Providers/PocketFeed.swift:89:33: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Providers/PocketFeed.swift:96:106: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Providers/PocketFeed.swift:106:50: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Storage/Logins.swift:401:22: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Storage/SQL/BrowserSchema.swift:1273:23: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Storage/SuggestedSites.swift:27:64: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Storage/SQL/SQLiteBookmarksSyncing.swift:381:13: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Sync/Synchronizers/TabsSynchronizer.swift:194:35: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/StdlibCollectionUnittest/CheckRangeReplaceableSliceType.swift:96:37: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/StdlibCollectionUnittest/CheckRangeReplaceableSliceType.swift:130:37: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/StdlibCollectionUnittest/CheckRangeReplaceableSliceType.swift:241:37: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/StdlibCollectionUnittest/CheckRangeReplaceableSliceType.swift:275:37: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/StdlibCollectionUnittest/CheckRangeReplaceableCollectionType.swift:817:33: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/StdlibCollectionUnittest/CheckRangeReplaceableCollectionType.swift:840:33: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/SwiftReflectionTest/SwiftReflectionTest.swift:417:16: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:21:27: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:22:34: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:31:13: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:32:6: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:64:27: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:65:34: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:67:18: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/BridgeObjectiveC.swift:580:33: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Builtin.swift:280:31: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:25:13: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int! instead of ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:88:19: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int! instead of ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:95:19: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int! instead of ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:108:17: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int! instead of ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:124:17: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int! instead of ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:130:32: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int! instead of ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:131:17: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int! instead of ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Optional.swift:122:13: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Optional.swift:681:27: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Optional.swift:685:44: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Optional.swift:714:19: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Optional.swift:731:19: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Optional.swift:753:10: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/KeyPath.swift:1050:31: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/KeyPath.swift:1845:15: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/StringCharacterView.swift:446:23: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/StringCharacterView.swift:589:23: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/IndexPath.swift:68:35: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/IndexPath.swift:297:39: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/IndexPath.swift:552:26: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/IndexPath.swift:581:42: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/IndexPath.swift:598:36: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/IndexPath.swift:696:27: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/Data.swift:951:24: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/Data.swift:1088:24: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/NSSet.swift:173:31: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/NSSet.swift:174:34: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. Int? instead of Optional<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:216:47: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:217:50: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:218:53: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:219:55: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:224:51: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:225:54: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:226:57: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:230:51: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:234:60: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:235:51: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:236:54: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:240:45: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:241:48: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:242:51: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:243:53: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Services/NotificationSettingsService.swift:172:22: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Utility/Analytics/WPAppAnalytics+Media.swift:8:55: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Utility/Media/MediaFileManager.swift:135:95: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/ViewRelated/Plans/PlanListRow.swift:64:93: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/ViewRelated/Plans/PlanListRow.swift:65:100: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)
⚠️	This PR introduced a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/WordPressTest/TestUtilities/JSONLoader.swift:5:39: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [String: Int] instead of Dictionary<String, Int>. (syntactic_sugar)

	90 Messages
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Aerial: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Aerial/Aerial/Source/Models/ManifestLoader.swift:103:82: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Aerial: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Aerial/Aerial/Source/Models/ManifestLoader.swift:106:50: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	Linting Aerial with this PR took 0.37s vs 0.34s on master (8% slower)
📖	Linting Alamofire with this PR took 2.39s vs 2.39s on master (0% slower)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Client/Frontend/Browser/BrowserViewController.swift:939:61: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Client/Frontend/Reader/ReaderMode.swift:269:39: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Providers/PocketFeed.swift:29:33: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Providers/PocketFeed.swift:88:49: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Providers/PocketFeed.swift:89:33: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Providers/PocketFeed.swift:96:106: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Providers/PocketFeed.swift:106:50: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Storage/Logins.swift:401:22: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Storage/SQL/BrowserSchema.swift:1273:23: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Storage/SuggestedSites.swift:27:64: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Storage/SQL/SQLiteBookmarksSyncing.swift:381:13: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Firefox: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Firefox/Sync/Synchronizers/TabsSynchronizer.swift:194:35: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	Linting Firefox with this PR took 10.18s vs 10.37s on master (1% faster)
📖	Linting Kickstarter with this PR took 15.66s vs 15.66s on master (0% slower)
📖	Linting Moya with this PR took 1.14s vs 1.17s on master (2% faster)
📖	Linting Nimble with this PR took 1.39s vs 1.39s on master (0% slower)
📖	Linting Quick with this PR took 0.45s vs 0.46s on master (2% faster)
📖	Linting Realm with this PR took 2.17s vs 2.18s on master (0% faster)
📖	Linting SourceKitten with this PR took 0.84s vs 0.86s on master (2% faster)
📖	Linting Sourcery with this PR took 3.66s vs 3.71s on master (1% faster)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/StdlibCollectionUnittest/CheckRangeReplaceableSliceType.swift:96:37: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/StdlibCollectionUnittest/CheckRangeReplaceableSliceType.swift:130:37: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/StdlibCollectionUnittest/CheckRangeReplaceableSliceType.swift:241:37: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/StdlibCollectionUnittest/CheckRangeReplaceableSliceType.swift:275:37: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/StdlibCollectionUnittest/CheckRangeReplaceableCollectionType.swift:817:33: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/StdlibCollectionUnittest/CheckRangeReplaceableCollectionType.swift:840:33: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/private/SwiftReflectionTest/SwiftReflectionTest.swift:417:16: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:21:27: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:22:34: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:31:13: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:32:6: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:64:27: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:65:34: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ArrayCast.swift:67:18: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/BridgeObjectiveC.swift:580:33: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Builtin.swift:280:31: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:25:13: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:88:19: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:95:19: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:108:17: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:124:17: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:130:32: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional.swift:131:17: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Optional.swift:122:13: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Optional.swift:681:27: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Optional.swift:685:44: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Optional.swift:714:19: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Optional.swift:731:19: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/Optional.swift:753:10: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/KeyPath.swift:1050:31: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/KeyPath.swift:1845:15: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/StringCharacterView.swift:446:23: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/core/StringCharacterView.swift:589:23: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/IndexPath.swift:68:35: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/IndexPath.swift:297:39: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/IndexPath.swift:552:26: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/IndexPath.swift:581:42: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/IndexPath.swift:598:36: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/IndexPath.swift:696:27: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/Data.swift:951:24: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/Data.swift:1088:24: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/NSSet.swift:173:31: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in Swift: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/Swift/stdlib/public/SDK/Foundation/NSSet.swift:174:34: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	Linting Swift with this PR took 10.01s vs 10.08s on master (0% faster)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:216:47: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:217:50: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:218:53: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:219:55: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:224:51: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:225:54: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:226:57: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:230:51: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:234:60: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:235:51: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:236:54: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:240:45: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:241:48: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:242:51: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Extensions/Notifications/NotificationBlock+Interface.swift:243:53: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Services/NotificationSettingsService.swift:172:22: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Utility/Analytics/WPAppAnalytics+Media.swift:8:55: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/Utility/Media/MediaFileManager.swift:135:95: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/ViewRelated/Plans/PlanListRow.swift:64:93: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/Classes/ViewRelated/Plans/PlanListRow.swift:65:100: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	This PR fixed a violation in WordPress: /Users/distiller/SwiftLint/osscheck/WordPress/WordPress/WordPressTest/TestUtilities/JSONLoader.swift:5:39: warning: Syntactic Sugar Violation: Shorthand syntactic sugar should be used, i.e. [Int] instead of Array<Int> (syntactic_sugar)
📖	Linting WordPress with this PR took 9.31s vs 9.29s on master (0% slower)

Generated by 🚫 Danger

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #1804 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 89.47%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1804      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.24%   88.24%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         226      226              
  Lines       11141    11178      +37     
==========================================
+ Hits         9831     9864      +33     
- Misses       1310     1314       +4

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../SwiftLintFramework/Rules/SyntacticSugarRule.swift	91.17% <89.47%> (-2.38%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 03676c9...b635d1f. Read the comment docs.

[freak4pc]

Awesome job here @marcelofabri ! Very elegant.