Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename oc_setup role into ocp_add_users #467

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

tonyskapunk
Copy link
Contributor

@tonyskapunk tonyskapunk commented Oct 16, 2024

SUMMARY

The new role is less rigid on the creation of users, allowing to create more or less, or append users when other users already exist.

ISSUE TYPE
  • Enhanced Feature
Tests

Test-Hints: no-check

The new role is less rigid on the creation of users, allowing to create
more or less, or append users when other users already exist.
@tonyskapunk tonyskapunk requested review from a team as code owners October 16, 2024 19:34
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 16, 2024

from change #467:

  • no check (not a code change)

1 similar comment
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 16, 2024

from change #467:

  • no check (not a code change)

@tonyskapunk tonyskapunk marked this pull request as draft October 16, 2024 19:34
@tonyskapunk
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest

Copy link

roles/ocp_add_users/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
roles/ocp_add_users/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
roles/ocp_add_users/tasks/add-users.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 16, 2024

@tonyskapunk tonyskapunk self-assigned this Oct 16, 2024
Copy link

@tonyskapunk
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 16, 2024

@tonyskapunk
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 16, 2024

@tonyskapunk
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 17, 2024

Copy link

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 17, 2024

Copy link

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 17, 2024

Copy link

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 17, 2024

Copy link

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 17, 2024

Copy link

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 17, 2024

@tonyskapunk
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 18, 2024

ramperher
ramperher previously approved these changes Oct 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ramperher ramperher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I saw the test cases are passing and the code structure looks good to me too.

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 18, 2024

from change #467:

  • no check (not a code change)

1 similar comment
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 18, 2024

from change #467:

  • no check (not a code change)

Copy link

betoredhat
betoredhat previously approved these changes Oct 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@betoredhat betoredhat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm 💯

@tonyskapunk tonyskapunk marked this pull request as ready for review October 18, 2024 21:50
@tonyskapunk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Another validation is currently undergoing it is to test that it can append users to already created users. Expecting a successful job.

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 18, 2024

@tonyskapunk
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 19, 2024

from change #467:

  • no check (not a code change)

1 similar comment
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 19, 2024

from change #467:

  • no check (not a code change)

@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 19, 2024

from change #467:

  • no check (not a code change)

1 similar comment
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Oct 19, 2024

from change #467:

  • no check (not a code change)

Copy link

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ Requires: python3-jmespath
Requires: python3-netaddr
Requires: python3-pyyaml
Requires: skopeo
Conflicts: dci-openshift-agent < 0.23.0
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants