Refactor Search Aggregation codes

[sazzad16]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 72.50% and project coverage change: +0.14 🎉

Comparison is base (0f760bc) 71.16% compared to head (70169ca) 71.31%.

❗ Current head 70169ca differs from pull request most recent head 1bdf7ea. Consider uploading reports for the commit 1bdf7ea to get more accurate results

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3451      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.16%   71.31%   +0.14%     
+ Complexity     4742     4737       -5     
============================================
  Files           275      274       -1     
  Lines         14748    14696      -52     
  Branches        998      992       -6     
============================================
- Hits          10495    10480      -15     
+ Misses         3816     3785      -31     
+ Partials        437      431       -6     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ava/redis/clients/jedis/search/FTSearchParams.java	67.48% <ø> (ø)
...rc/main/java/redis/clients/jedis/search/Query.java	78.50% <ø> (ø)
...java/redis/clients/jedis/search/aggr/Reducers.java	20.00% <18.18%> (+7.50%)	⬆️
.../java/redis/clients/jedis/search/aggr/Reducer.java	68.18% <62.50%> (+8.18%)	⬆️
.../clients/jedis/search/aggr/AggregationBuilder.java	84.70% <84.09%> (-2.05%)	⬇️
...ain/java/redis/clients/jedis/search/FieldName.java	74.28% <100.00%> (+9.16%)	⬆️
...ava/redis/clients/jedis/search/SearchProtocol.java	97.77% <100.00%> (ø)
...in/java/redis/clients/jedis/search/aggr/Group.java	100.00% <100.00%> (+23.07%)	⬆️
...ain/java/redis/clients/jedis/util/LazyRawable.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.