-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(esm): use CJS wrapper for ESM default interop #10119
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jtoar
force-pushed
the
ds-vite/use-cjs-wrapper
branch
from
March 6, 2024 09:57
26bdf8b
to
1512890
Compare
jtoar
force-pushed
the
ds-vite/use-cjs-wrapper
branch
from
March 6, 2024 12:10
bd025fb
to
7a3524c
Compare
Tobbe
approved these changes
Mar 7, 2024
jtoar
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2024
Tried building with esbuild in #10119 but ran into an error with CI. Keen on trying to fix that here. Looks like it was just a matter of updating the default entry points so far.
ahaywood
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2024
This PR builds on the work started in #10083. It does two things: - ~builds the `@redwoodjs/vite` package with esbuild instead of babel (this is optional but just did it to debug, but I'd imagine we'd want to start doing this anyway)~ - CI wasn't happy with this change so removed for now - introduces a CJS wrapper to handle ESM export default interoperation in Node To frame this change at a high level, one of the ways I'm approaching ESM is backwards from Redwood apps. If Redwood apps can be ESM (via "type": "module" in package.jsons, updates to tsconfigs, adding file extensions to relative imports, etc), then we may have an easier time rolling out packages that can't be shipped as dual ESM/CJS exports. (Vite is probably one of them. But since Vite evaluates the config file itself, it may be ok.) One of the framework-level bugs that shows up when you make an app ESM is this error: ``` failed to load config from ~/redwood/redwood-app-esm/web/vite.config.mts file:///~/redwood/redwood-app-esm/web/vite.config.mts.timestamp-1709251612918- 6f6a7f8efad05.mjs:7 plugins: [redwood()] ^ TypeError: redwood is not a function at file:///~/redwood/redwood-app-esm/web/vite.config.mts.timestamp-1709251612918- 6f6a7f8efad05.mjs:7:13 ``` The culprit is this import in `web/vite.config.ts`: ```ts import redwood from '@redwoodjs/vite' ``` The problem is confusing, but basically... when you 1) transpile an ES module into CJS (which is what we're doing for most of our packages) and then 2) import that CJS module from a bona fide ES module, the default export doesn't behave how you'd expect. Evan Wallace has a great write up of it [here](https://esbuild.github.io/content-types/#default-interop). (For Node's official docs, see https://nodejs.org/docs/latest/api/esm.html#commonjs-namespaces.) As a potential fix, @Tobbe pointed me to this Vite plugin: https://github.com/cyco130/vite-plugin-cjs-interop. I tried adding it but the issue is that this **is** the Vite config file. 😅 But I thought I may be able to add the plugin here when we call `createServer`: https://github.com/redwoodjs/redwood/blob/e9ecbb07da216210c59a1e499816f31c025fe81d/packages/vite/bins/rw-vite-dev.mjs#L28-L37 But it still wasn't working. I stepped through the source a bit and it doesn't seem like there's room for configuring how Vite loads the config file. The two main functions were these, `loadConfigFromBundledFile` and `loadConfigFromFile`: - https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/e92abe58164682c2e468318c05023bfb4ecdfa02/packages/vite/src/node/config.ts#L1186 - https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/e92abe58164682c2e468318c05023bfb4ecdfa02/packages/vite/src/node/config.ts#L962 `bundleConfigFile` has plugins configured, but they're hardcoded. But luckily I don't think it's necessary... based on this esbuild thread, it seems like we can get away with a small wrapper. See evanw/esbuild#532. When we actually make this an ES module (which will happen pretty soon I think), this will go away. But for the time being, this is a CJS module.
jtoar
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2024
Tried building with esbuild in #10119 but ran into an error with CI. Keen on trying to fix that here. Looks like it was just a matter of updating the default entry points so far.
jtoar
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2024
This PR builds on the work started in #10083. It does two things: - ~builds the `@redwoodjs/vite` package with esbuild instead of babel (this is optional but just did it to debug, but I'd imagine we'd want to start doing this anyway)~ - CI wasn't happy with this change so removed for now - introduces a CJS wrapper to handle ESM export default interoperation in Node To frame this change at a high level, one of the ways I'm approaching ESM is backwards from Redwood apps. If Redwood apps can be ESM (via "type": "module" in package.jsons, updates to tsconfigs, adding file extensions to relative imports, etc), then we may have an easier time rolling out packages that can't be shipped as dual ESM/CJS exports. (Vite is probably one of them. But since Vite evaluates the config file itself, it may be ok.) One of the framework-level bugs that shows up when you make an app ESM is this error: ``` failed to load config from ~/redwood/redwood-app-esm/web/vite.config.mts file:///~/redwood/redwood-app-esm/web/vite.config.mts.timestamp-1709251612918- 6f6a7f8efad05.mjs:7 plugins: [redwood()] ^ TypeError: redwood is not a function at file:///~/redwood/redwood-app-esm/web/vite.config.mts.timestamp-1709251612918- 6f6a7f8efad05.mjs:7:13 ``` The culprit is this import in `web/vite.config.ts`: ```ts import redwood from '@redwoodjs/vite' ``` The problem is confusing, but basically... when you 1) transpile an ES module into CJS (which is what we're doing for most of our packages) and then 2) import that CJS module from a bona fide ES module, the default export doesn't behave how you'd expect. Evan Wallace has a great write up of it [here](https://esbuild.github.io/content-types/#default-interop). (For Node's official docs, see https://nodejs.org/docs/latest/api/esm.html#commonjs-namespaces.) As a potential fix, @Tobbe pointed me to this Vite plugin: https://github.com/cyco130/vite-plugin-cjs-interop. I tried adding it but the issue is that this **is** the Vite config file. 😅 But I thought I may be able to add the plugin here when we call `createServer`: https://github.com/redwoodjs/redwood/blob/e9ecbb07da216210c59a1e499816f31c025fe81d/packages/vite/bins/rw-vite-dev.mjs#L28-L37 But it still wasn't working. I stepped through the source a bit and it doesn't seem like there's room for configuring how Vite loads the config file. The two main functions were these, `loadConfigFromBundledFile` and `loadConfigFromFile`: - https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/e92abe58164682c2e468318c05023bfb4ecdfa02/packages/vite/src/node/config.ts#L1186 - https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/e92abe58164682c2e468318c05023bfb4ecdfa02/packages/vite/src/node/config.ts#L962 `bundleConfigFile` has plugins configured, but they're hardcoded. But luckily I don't think it's necessary... based on this esbuild thread, it seems like we can get away with a small wrapper. See evanw/esbuild#532. When we actually make this an ES module (which will happen pretty soon I think), this will go away. But for the time being, this is a CJS module.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR builds on the work started in #10083. It does two things:
builds the@redwoodjs/vite
package with esbuild instead of babel (this is optional but just did it to debug, but I'd imagine we'd want to start doing this anyway)To frame this change at a high level, one of the ways I'm approaching ESM is backwards from Redwood apps. If Redwood apps can be ESM (via "type": "module" in package.jsons, updates to tsconfigs, adding file extensions to relative imports, etc), then we may have an easier time rolling out packages that can't be shipped as dual ESM/CJS exports. (Vite is probably one of them. But since Vite evaluates the config file itself, it may be ok.)
One of the framework-level bugs that shows up when you make an app ESM is this error:
The culprit is this import in
web/vite.config.ts
:The problem is confusing, but basically... when you 1) transpile an ES module into CJS (which is what we're doing for most of our packages) and then 2) import that CJS module from a bona fide ES module, the default export doesn't behave how you'd expect. Evan Wallace has a great write up of it here. (For Node's official docs, see https://nodejs.org/docs/latest/api/esm.html#commonjs-namespaces.)
As a potential fix, @Tobbe pointed me to this Vite plugin: https://github.com/cyco130/vite-plugin-cjs-interop. I tried adding it but the issue is that this is the Vite config file. 😅
But I thought I may be able to add the plugin here when we call
createServer
:redwood/packages/vite/bins/rw-vite-dev.mjs
Lines 28 to 37 in e9ecbb0
But it still wasn't working. I stepped through the source a bit and it doesn't seem like there's room for configuring how Vite loads the config file. The two main functions were these,
loadConfigFromBundledFile
andloadConfigFromFile
:bundleConfigFile
has plugins configured, but they're hardcoded.But luckily I don't think it's necessary... based on this esbuild thread, it seems like we can get away with a small wrapper. See evanw/esbuild#532. When we actually make this an ES module (which will happen pretty soon I think), this will go away. But for the time being, this is a CJS module.