Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Use Job Worker instead of Supplier for Subcontracting #2471

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

Ninad1306
Copy link
Contributor

@Ninad1306 Ninad1306 commented Jul 25, 2024

Related changes for erpnext:
frappe/erpnext#42383

Huly®: IC-2585

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.37%. Comparing base (94341ac) to head (7d8b077).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2471   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    61.37%   61.37%           
========================================
  Files          117      117           
  Lines        11204    11204           
========================================
  Hits          6877     6877           
  Misses        4327     4327           
Files Coverage Δ
...ia_compliance/gst_india/constants/custom_fields.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Impacted file tree graph

@vorasmit vorasmit merged commit 7a24e44 into resilient-tech:develop Jul 25, 2024
13 checks passed
mergify bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
…tfix/pr-2471

fix: Use Job Worker instead of Supplier for Subcontracting (backport #2471)
@Ninad1306 Ninad1306 deleted the fields_modification branch August 21, 2024 08:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants