-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove OptimisticTransactionDB #1428
Comments
Postponed until we have |
There is an open issue for adding support for |
tillrohrmann
added a commit
to tillrohrmann/restate
that referenced
this issue
Aug 23, 2024
This commit replaces the OptimisticTransactionDB with the normal DB and using WriteBatchWithIndex instead of transactions. This fixes restatedev#1428.
tillrohrmann
added a commit
to tillrohrmann/restate
that referenced
this issue
Aug 23, 2024
This commit replaces the OptimisticTransactionDB with the normal DB and using WriteBatchWithIndex instead of transactions. This fixes restatedev#1428.
tillrohrmann
added a commit
to tillrohrmann/restate
that referenced
this issue
Aug 24, 2024
This commit replaces the OptimisticTransactionDB with the normal DB and using WriteBatchWithIndex instead of transactions. This fixes restatedev#1428.
tillrohrmann
added a commit
to tillrohrmann/restate
that referenced
this issue
Aug 24, 2024
This commit replaces the OptimisticTransactionDB with the normal DB and using WriteBatchWithIndex instead of transactions. This fixes restatedev#1428.
tillrohrmann
added a commit
to tillrohrmann/restate
that referenced
this issue
Aug 26, 2024
This commit replaces the OptimisticTransactionDB with the normal DB and using WriteBatchWithIndex instead of transactions. This fixes restatedev#1428.
tillrohrmann
added a commit
to tillrohrmann/restate
that referenced
this issue
Aug 26, 2024
This commit replaces the OptimisticTransactionDB with the normal DB and using WriteBatchWithIndex instead of transactions. This fixes restatedev#1428.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We are going to use a forked version of the rocksdb library to extend the bindings to expose more RocksDB functionality. Eventually, we will also expose the
WriteBatchWithIndex
which would allow us to read our own writes. Hence, we no longer need to use theOptimisticTransactionDB
mode from RocksDB (right now, we actually don't require reading our own writes).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: