Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bifrost] Periodic tail checker #2064

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024
Merged

[Bifrost] Periodic tail checker #2064

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

AhmedSoliman
Copy link
Contributor

@AhmedSoliman AhmedSoliman commented Oct 11, 2024

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Test Results

  5 files  ±0    5 suites  ±0   2m 47s ⏱️ ±0s
 45 tests ±0   45 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
114 runs  ±0  114 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 5090df5. ± Comparison against base commit ef3ffc4.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

This puts together the design and implementation of the tail repair procedure that's required when FindTail cannot establish a consistent durable tail from log-servers. The details are described as comments in code.
@AhmedSoliman AhmedSoliman marked this pull request as ready for review October 11, 2024 12:37
@AhmedSoliman AhmedSoliman requested review from muhamadazmy and tillrohrmann and removed request for muhamadazmy October 11, 2024 12:37
Copy link
Contributor

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good to me. +1 for merging. I assume this prevents some operations from being stuck that are waiting for a tail update that does otherwise not arrive because no messages are exchanged. Out of curiosity did you run into such a situation while testing?

@AhmedSoliman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes. This is expected to be the usual case when running a read stream on a non-sequencer node.

@AhmedSoliman AhmedSoliman merged commit 5090df5 into main Oct 11, 2024
17 checks passed
@AhmedSoliman AhmedSoliman deleted the pr2064 branch October 11, 2024 12:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants