Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support scheduling/re-scheduling with resource group #19719

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shanicky
Copy link
Contributor

@shanicky shanicky commented Dec 9, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

This PR adds support for resource groups for database (although it is not enabled), and provides specific resource group support for the materialized views that will be used for serverless backfill.

At the same time, scaling also supports resource groups.

Currently, we haven't added any frontend syntax, so all the resource groups are set to default.

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)

@shanicky shanicky force-pushed the peng/label-schedule branch from 0ac70ab to dcb25c7 Compare December 9, 2024 08:54
@shanicky shanicky marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2024 14:37
@graphite-app graphite-app bot requested a review from a team December 10, 2024 08:37
@shanicky shanicky changed the title feat: support scheduling/re-scheduling with label feat: support scheduling/re-scheduling with resource group Dec 10, 2024
@shanicky shanicky requested a review from yezizp2012 December 10, 2024 11:36
Signed-off-by: Shanicky Chen <peng@risingwave-labs.com>
…tion signatures

Signed-off-by: Shanicky Chen <peng@risingwave-labs.com>
Signed-off-by: Shanicky Chen <peng@risingwave-labs.com>
Signed-off-by: Shanicky Chen <peng@risingwave-labs.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant