Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(snapshot-backfill): introduce state to snapshot backfill #19720

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wenym1
Copy link
Contributor

@wenym1 wenym1 commented Dec 9, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

Copy link
Contributor Author

wenym1 commented Dec 9, 2024

@wenym1 wenym1 force-pushed the yiming/storage-table-iter-avoid-slice-clone branch from 641fa65 to a3f0881 Compare December 10, 2024 10:35
@wenym1 wenym1 force-pushed the yiming/snapshot-backfill-progress-state branch from c2868dd to d5c4a10 Compare December 10, 2024 10:36
Base automatically changed from yiming/storage-table-iter-avoid-slice-clone to main December 11, 2024 03:46
@wenym1 wenym1 force-pushed the yiming/snapshot-backfill-progress-state branch from d5c4a10 to 5567d22 Compare December 11, 2024 05:58
@wenym1 wenym1 force-pushed the yiming/snapshot-backfill-progress-state branch from 5567d22 to ba717b7 Compare December 12, 2024 07:53
if self.streams.is_empty() {
break Poll::Ready(Ok(None));
}
for (vnode, stream) in &mut self.streams {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will polling the streams in vnode order cause starvation or data skew in downstream? Should we use FuturesUnordered instead?

Comment on lines +245 to +247
let uncommitted = backfill_state.uncommitted_state();
// TODO: apply to progress state table
drop(uncommitted);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you explain why we need to get the reference of the uncommitted state and drop it immediately?

@@ -105,6 +117,8 @@ impl<S: StateStore> SnapshotBackfillExecutor<S> {
let first_recv_barrier = receive_next_barrier(&mut self.barrier_rx).await?;
debug!(epoch = ?first_recv_barrier.epoch, "get first inject barrier");
let should_backfill = first_barrier.epoch != first_recv_barrier.epoch;
let mut backfill_state =
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see we persist the state. Will it be done in a separated PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants