-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 590
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(stream): stream hop window ignore the null time #8146
Conversation
| └─BatchProject { exprs: [auction, date_time] } | ||
| └─BatchSource { source: "bid", columns: ["auction", "bidder", "price", "channel", "url", "date_time", "extra", "_row_id"], filter: (None, None) } | ||
| └─BatchFilter { predicate: IsNotNull(date_time) } | ||
| └─BatchProject { exprs: [auction, date_time] } | ||
| └─BatchFilter { predicate: IsNotNull(date_time) } | ||
| └─BatchSource { source: "bid", columns: ["auction", "bidder", "price", "channel", "url", "date_time", "extra", "_row_id"], filter: (None, None) } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chenzl25 PTAL, is the redundant Filter generated by predicate pushdown across the Share node?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I will separate the batch and stream logical optimization in the future so that plan-sharing wouldn't affect batch queries.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8146 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 71.16% 71.62% +0.46%
==========================================
Files 1129 1131 +2
Lines 181606 182002 +396
==========================================
+ Hits 129232 130364 +1132
+ Misses 52374 51638 -736
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
fix #8130 Approved-By: liurenjie1024
@st1page The change here is data records that has null time values will be ignored by time window functions. Correct? |
Yes! |
I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.
What's changed and what's your intention?
fix #8130
Checklist For Contributors
./risedev check
(or alias,./risedev c
)Checklist For Reviewers
- [ ] I have requested macro/micro-benchmarks as this PR can affect performance substantially, and the results are shown.