allow custom cmd option for rubocop

[desheikh]

Add a custom command option for when you want to use bundled or bin stubbed version of rubocop.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 447927375

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 330803147:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	135
Relevant Lines:	135

---

💛 - Coveralls

[desheikh]

@bbatsov would you be able to review this?

[desheikh]

Gentle bump. @koic perhaps if you are able?

[freesteph]

Also registering interest for this simple but essential feature.

[databyte]

Yes, works great with spring to generate a binstub for rubocop so you can start executing it even faster.

[databyte]

I'd also like to just execute rubocop within guard for modified files only. Example cmd:

guard :rubocop, cmd: "git ls-files -m | xargs ls -1 2>/dev/null | grep '\.rb$' | xargs bin/rubocop" do
  watch(%r{.+\.rb$})
  watch(%r{(?:.+/)?\.rubocop(?:_todo)?\.yml$}) { |m| File.dirname(m[0]) }
end

[koic]

This looks good to me. However I don't have release authority of this gem.
@yujinakayama @bbatsov Can you review and release this one?

[bbatsov]

Ops, seems I had unwatched this repo by accident and didn't see the previous messages. Sorry about that!

This change looks good indeed, but should also be mentioned in the changelog and the README (otherwise it's unlikely that someone will find it).

[desheikh]

Ops, seems I had unwatched this repo by accident and didn't see the previous messages. Sorry about that!

This change looks good indeed, but should also be mentioned in the changelog and the README (otherwise it's unlikely that someone will find it).

Thanks Team! I've updated the README.

[bbatsov]

Hmm, something's wrong with the CI build.

[databyte]

Looks like that issue is very intermittent from multiple posts to coveralls.

References:

• Always getting Error: Bad response: 422 {"message":"Couldn't find a repository matching this job.","error":true} coverallsapp/github-action#81
• Coveralls public issues for the error

[bbatsov]

Okay, I'll merge this and I'll cut a new release after we update the CI for Ruby 3.

[koic]

Or I can update the CI over this weekend and cut a new release. (coverall's issue may be commented out as a workaround)

[koic]

I've released v1.5.0. Thank you!
https://github.com/rubocop/guard-rubocop/releases/tag/v1.5.0