-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Switch to StdioInputMethod when TERM is 'dumb' #907
Merged
tompng
merged 3 commits into
ruby:master
from
dgutov:no_multiline_or_singleline_on_dumb_term
May 1, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about
STDIN.tty? && STDOUT.tty?
? Does this solves your problem?When STDIN and STDOUT are both tty, it is executed in an interactive terminal.
Reline and IRB both have a tty check, but there is an inconsistency. IRB only checks
STDIN.tty?
, and on the other hand, Reline only checks$stdout.tty?
. If$stdout
is not a tty or TERM is dumb, Reline enters unusable test mode.ENV['TERM'] == 'dumb'
is used for testing IRB with Reline. Although usingENV['TERM']
like this is a bit weird, changing the TERM=dumb behavior right now will break the test.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately, both
STDIN.tty?
andSTDOUT.tty?
return true when the shell is running inside Emacs. But apparently some of the terminal features it's using don't work as expected in that environment. So treating "dumb" terminals differently makes sense to me (that's the definition - terminal with limited capabilities).Do you know any other real-world "dumb" terminals? It could be useful to test IRB in one of them as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The tests are indeed currently broken by this change, any recommendations for finding a fix would be welcome.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. Thanks for the explanation. I agree IRB should treat dumb terminals differently 👍
For test, could you add a way to test IRB by forcing
term_interactive?
to be true?Let it return true if
ENV["TEST_IRB_FORCE_INTERACTIVE"]
is set, and in IRB's test which usesPTY.spawn
, specify both TEST_IRB_FORCE_INTERACTIVE and TERM=dumb env.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, added.