Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes typo #2816

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2021
Merged

Fixes typo #2816

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions src/ch03-05-control-flow.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -352,9 +352,9 @@ index < 4`, the code would panic. Using the `for` loop, you wouldn’t need to
remember to change any other code if you changed the number of values in the
array.

The safety and conciseness of `for` loops make them the most commonly used loop
construct in Rust. Even in situations in which you want to run some code a
certain number of times, as in the countdown example that used a `while` loop
The safety and conciseness of `for` loops makes them the most commonly used
loop construct in Rust. Even in situations in which you want to run some code
a certain number of times, as in the countdown example that used a `while` loop
in Listing 3-3, most Rustaceans would use a `for` loop. The way to do that
would be to use a `Range`, which is a type provided by the standard library
that generates all numbers in sequence starting from one number and ending
Expand Down