-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add cargo lucifer
subcommand
#6666
Comments
I dig the joke 😄 Could this use case be satisfied by documenting something along the lines of |
To propose a bikeshed here, I think it should be called |
@dwijnand Maybe |
This is how I map log levels:
But actually, make this detail (or some of it) should be printed by |
As for "what other versions and why this one", that gets complicated with a lot of information involved. Not really seeing a way around that than Probably the main thing left is documenting these resources somewhere. Like the section of the documentation on the resolver. |
docs(ref): Highlight commands to answer dep resolution questions Previously, in the #6666, the aptly named `cargo lucifer` was suggested for answering resolver questions. Turns out most of these can be answered now, between logging and `cargo tree`. This adds troubleshooting tips to help highlight the use of these commands to answer these questions. Fixes #6666
Add a new subcommand that brings light (get it?) to cargo's dependency resolving, answering questions like
Yes, I made this issue because I saw the last issue was number 6665. Feel free to close it as "bad joke".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: