-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multi-target build #8156
Labels
C-feature-request
Category: proposal for a feature. Before PR, ping rust-lang/cargo if this is not `Feature accepted`
Comments
Mygod
added
the
C-feature-request
Category: proposal for a feature. Before PR, ping rust-lang/cargo if this is not `Feature accepted`
label
Apr 24, 2020
Thanks for the report! This is actually a refactoring I've wanted to do for some time now, so I've mustered up the motivation and pushed up #8167 to implement this. |
alexcrichton
added a commit
to alexcrichton/cargo
that referenced
this issue
Apr 28, 2020
This commit refactors the internals of Cargo to no longer have a singular `--target` flag (and singular `requested_target` kind throught) but to instead have a list. The semantics of multiple `--target` flags is to build the selected targets for each of the input `--target` flag inputs. For now this is gated behind `-Zmultitarget` as an unstable features, since I'm not entirely sure this is the interface we want. In general it'd be great if we had a way to simply specify `Unit` structures of what to build on the CLI, but we're in general very far away from that, so I figured that this is probably sufficient at least for testing for now. cc rust-lang#8156
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 29, 2020
Support multiple `--target` flags on the CLI This commit refactors the internals of Cargo to no longer have a singular `--target` flag (and singular `requested_target` kind throught) but to instead have a list. The semantics of multiple `--target` flags is to build the selected targets for each of the input `--target` flag inputs. For now this is gated behind `-Zmultitarget` as an unstable features, since I'm not entirely sure this is the interface we want. In general it'd be great if we had a way to simply specify `Unit` structures of what to build on the CLI, but we're in general very far away from that, so I figured that this is probably sufficient at least for testing for now. cc #8156
Closing in favor of tracking issue #8176. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
C-feature-request
Category: proposal for a feature. Before PR, ping rust-lang/cargo if this is not `Feature accepted`
Describe the problem you are trying to solve
When building rust code for an Android app, it is common to build for multiple targets, e.g. (ARM, x86) ⊗ (32 bits, 64 bits). While
cargo build
is already parallel in some sense, LTO (or last step compilation in general) is single threaded and can take a long time to run. It makes sense to use up the CPU resources for building other targets.Describe the solution you'd like
Multi-target build with
--target=armv7-linux-androideabi --target=aarch64-linux-android ...
.Notes
See also plugin: https://github.com/mozilla/rust-android-gradle
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: