Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix some typos #13714

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2024
Merged

chore: fix some typos #13714

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 6, 2024

Conversation

guqicun
Copy link
Contributor

@guqicun guqicun commented Apr 6, 2024

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: guqicun <guqicun@outlook.com>
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 6, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @weihanglo (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added A-build-execution Area: anything dealing with executing the compiler A-documenting-cargo-itself Area: Cargo's documentation A-git Area: anything dealing with git A-unstable Area: nightly unstable support Command-add S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 6, 2024
@weihanglo
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 6, 2024

📌 Commit 6631435 has been approved by weihanglo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 6, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 6, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 6631435 with merge ce3c14a...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 6, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: weihanglo
Pushing ce3c14a to master...

@bors bors merged commit ce3c14a into rust-lang:master Apr 6, 2024
21 checks passed
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
Update cargo

11 commits in 28e7b2bc0a812f90126be30f48a00a4ada990eaa..74fd5bc730b828dbc956335b229ac34ba47f7ef7
2024-04-05 19:31:01 +0000 to 2024-04-10 18:40:49 +0000
- chore: downgrade to openssl v1.1.1 (again) (rust-lang/cargo#13731)
- fix(cargo-fix): dont apply same suggestion twice (rust-lang/cargo#13728)
- refactor: make `resolve_with_previous` clearer (rust-lang/cargo#13727)
- fix(package): Normalize paths in `Cargo.toml` (rust-lang/cargo#13729)
- refactor: Track when MSRV is explicitly set, either way (rust-lang/cargo#13732)
- [fix]:Build script not rerun when target rustflags change (rust-lang/cargo#13560)
- feat(add): Stabilize MSRV-aware version req selection (rust-lang/cargo#13608)
- Fix github fast path redirect. (rust-lang/cargo#13718)
- Add release notes for 1.77.1 (rust-lang/cargo#13717)
- doc(semver): remove mention of deprecated tool rust-semverver (rust-lang/cargo#13715)
- chore: fix some typos (rust-lang/cargo#13714)

r? ghost
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Apr 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-build-execution Area: anything dealing with executing the compiler A-documenting-cargo-itself Area: Cargo's documentation A-git Area: anything dealing with git A-unstable Area: nightly unstable support Command-add S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants