Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add package spec support to profile overrides. #5491

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2018

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented May 5, 2018

Note: It errors out if multiple overrides match the same package. This could potentially merge the overrides together with a hierarchy similar to CSS specificity. However, that seems overkill for now.

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @matklad

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

Note: It errors out if multiple overrides match the same package.  This could potentially merge the overrides together with a hierarchy similar to CSS specificity.  However, that seems overkill for now.
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

Nice!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 6, 2018

📌 Commit 5415a34 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 6, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 5415a34 with merge b429a36...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2018
Add package spec support to profile overrides.

Note: It errors out if multiple overrides match the same package.  This could potentially merge the overrides together with a hierarchy similar to CSS specificity.  However, that seems overkill for now.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 6, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing b429a36 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 5415a34 into rust-lang:master May 6, 2018
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.27.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants