Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix --manifest-path for verbatim paths #8881

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Fix --manifest-path for verbatim paths #8881

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

dylni
Copy link

@dylni dylni commented Nov 22, 2020

This lets --manifest-path be a verbatim path (\\?\C:\full\path\to\manifest) without causing:

error: package collision in the lockfile: packages dep_b v0.1.0 (C:\full\path\to\bug\main\../dep_b) and dep_b v0.1.0 (C:\full\path\to\bug\dep_b) are different, but only one can be written to lockfile unambigiously

There are 2 commits:

  • The first commit is the minimum required to fix the issue.

  • The second commit also improves normalization of that section to resolve .. correctly on Unix, but it causes some test regressions. They can be fixed by using the original path when normalization fails, which Cargo does in other cases.

    Should I keep the regressions or use that fallback for this PR too?

Closes #6198

cc @Eh2406

@rust-highfive
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Eh2406 (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 22, 2020
@dylni
Copy link
Author

dylni commented Nov 22, 2020

This is the failing line:

assert_eq!(causes.len(), 2, "{:?}", causes);

I don't know enough about this test to figure out the right fix.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

There's some more discussion about this on #7729, but unfortunately path normalization is tricky in Cargo and is something we try to review pretty closely. We primarily try to normalize as little as possible as well as only having one method of normalization rather than multiple.

I think these issues would be great to fix but I haven't investigated them enough myself to know how to best do so. I think it would be good though to add a suite of test if possible. If this is just fixing one issue for Windows UNC paths then the fix can probably be a bit more isolated?

@dylni
Copy link
Author

dylni commented Nov 23, 2020

@alexcrichton The new function uses the GetFullPathNameW syscall on Windows, which normpath provides with PathExt::normalize. It should always return a correct normalized path, but others reviewing the code is always welcome. My intention is to eventually remove normalize_path_legacy and convert all uses to the safer syscall version.

I can add some tests here if this change is decided to be useful, but I've made sure to test normpath extensively to make sure it can be used in these situations. The test from the bug report has already been added.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #8907) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:

@rustbot modify labels: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-author

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 6, 2021

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #9051) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 22, 2021

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #9292) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@dylni dylni marked this pull request as ready for review March 23, 2021 04:02
@dylni
Copy link
Author

dylni commented Mar 23, 2021

@alexcrichton @Eh2406 Does this PR require anything else? It's a start to fixing more normalization issues.

@64
Copy link

64 commented Jul 15, 2021

Bump.

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Aug 6, 2021

Closing as this PR is quite old, and unfortunately it isn't entirely clear on how to proceed with fixing the Windows paths issues (and unfortunately none of us have much time to invest in this). I have opened #9769 as a meta issue to cover this. I understand this can be a frustrating issue to deal with, and this isn't saying we don't want it fixed (we very much do!), but that we want to better understand how to proceed. Thanks!

@ehuss ehuss closed this Aug 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

"Package collision in lockfile" using UNC/root local device/etc paths
7 participants