-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix doc duplicate removal of root units. #9276
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Mar 16, 2021
I think this is also a candidate for beta. |
@bors: r+ Makes sense to me to backport yeah |
📌 Commit e50292a has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 16, 2021
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
ehuss
pushed a commit
to ehuss/cargo
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2021
…excrichton Fix doc duplicate removal of root units. The doc collision removal code didn't consider the possibility that there was a collision with a root unit. This caused problems in conjunction with rust-lang#9142 where cargo would panic because a root unit got removed from the graph because of a filename collision. The solution here is to avoid removing root units during the doc collision sweep. This has a downside that this reintroduces a filename collision. An alternate solution would be to make the set of root units mutable, and remove from that list, but I figured this is simpler and more conservative. Fixes rust-lang#9274
Merged
JohnTitor
added a commit
to JohnTitor/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2021
Update cargo 8 commits in 32da9eaa5de5be241cf8096ca6b749a157194f77..90691f2bfe9a50291a98983b1ed2feab51d5ca55 2021-03-13 01:18:40 +0000 to 2021-03-16 21:36:55 +0000 - Add report if `cargo fix --edition` changes features. (rust-lang/cargo#9268) - Fix --feature pkg/feat for V1 resolver for non-member. (rust-lang/cargo#9275) - Fix doc duplicate removal of root units. (rust-lang/cargo#9276) - Add CLI help text for patch-in-config (rust-lang/cargo#9271) - Document `-Zpatch-in-config` (rust-lang/cargo#9270) - Support [patch] in .cargo/config files (rust-lang/cargo#9204) - Add `--future-incompat-report` support to `cargo test` (rust-lang/cargo#9264) - 🍱 Crop favicon (rust-lang/cargo#9262)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The doc collision removal code didn't consider the possibility that there was a collision with a root unit. This caused problems in conjunction with #9142 where cargo would panic because a root unit got removed from the graph because of a filename collision. The solution here is to avoid removing root units during the doc collision sweep.
This has a downside that this reintroduces a filename collision.
An alternate solution would be to make the set of root units mutable, and remove from that list, but I figured this is simpler and more conservative.
Fixes #9274