Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Blacklist update needed #126

Closed
est31 opened this issue Aug 20, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Blacklist update needed #126

est31 opened this issue Aug 20, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@est31
Copy link
Member

est31 commented Aug 20, 2017

Here are some flaky/buggy tests:

rust-lang/rust#43957
rust-lang/rust#43958
rust-lang/rust#43959
rust-lang/rust#43960
rust-lang/rust#43961
rust-lang/rust#43962
rust-lang/rust#43963
@est31
Copy link
Member Author

est31 commented Aug 21, 2017

cc @tomprince

@aidanhs
Copy link
Member

aidanhs commented Aug 24, 2017

cc @eddyb

@kennytm kennytm mentioned this issue Aug 29, 2017
Merged
@est31
Copy link
Member Author

est31 commented Sep 9, 2017

Another needed entry rust-lang/rust#44448

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Sep 11, 2017

This one is also good to look at: rust-lang/rust#44211 (comment) - purely stricter type inference, so anything other than a compiler error is likely spurious.

Ignoring timeouts and duplicates with blacklist post-#127:

Yes, just one - but I'm noticing that some are already in the blacklist (e.g. hashconsing-0.3.0) but that doesn't affect the report? Is the blacklist used automatically at all anywhere?

@est31
Copy link
Member Author

est31 commented Sep 11, 2017

@eddyb there is no automation yet, sadly: #100

@kennytm kennytm mentioned this issue Sep 13, 2017
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@eddyb @aidanhs @pietroalbini @est31