[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take a…

…dvantage of

the isRegSequence property.

This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the
isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM.

Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able
to optimize the following sequence:
vmov	d0, r2, r3
vmov	d1, r0, r1
vmov	r0, s0
vmov	r1, s2
udiv	r0, r1, r0
vmov	r1, s1
vmov	r2, s3
udiv	r1, r2, r1
vmov.32	d16[0], r0
vmov.32	d16[1], r1
vmov	r0, r1, d16
bx	lr

into:
udiv	r0, r0, r2
udiv	r1, r1, r3
vmov.32	d16[0], r0
vmov.32	d16[1], r1
vmov	r0, r1, d16
bx	lr

This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole
optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that
replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register
file), copy.

With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations:
1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies:
PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy.
2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies:
PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy.

The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the
operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction
and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s).

Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100.

The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the
TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we
switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register
(virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with
register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo.

Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the
rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1).

Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole
optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting.

This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>.

Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@216088 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

lib/CodeGen/Passes.cpp

@@ -607,6 +607,9 @@ void TargetPassConfig::addMachineSSAOptimization() {
   printAndVerify("After Machine LICM, CSE and Sinking passes");
 
   addPass(&PeepholeOptimizerID);
+  // Clean-up the dead code that may have been generated by peephole
+  // rewriting.
+  addPass(&DeadMachineInstructionElimID);
   printAndVerify("After codegen peephole optimization pass");
 }