Auto merge of #122568 - RalfJung:mentioned-items, r=oli-obk

recursively evaluate the constants in everything that is 'mentioned'

This is another attempt at fixing rust-lang/rust#107503. The previous attempt at rust-lang/rust#112879 seems stuck in figuring out where the [perf regression](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=c55d1ee8d4e3162187214692229a63c2cc5e0f31&end=ec8de1ebe0d698b109beeaaac83e60f4ef8bb7d1&stat=instructions:u) comes from. In  rust-lang/rust#122258 I learned some things, which informed the approach this PR is taking.

Quoting from the new collector docs, which explain the high-level idea:
```rust
//! One important role of collection is to evaluate all constants that are used by all the items
//! which are being collected. Codegen can then rely on only encountering constants that evaluate
//! successfully, and if a constant fails to evaluate, the collector has much better context to be
//! able to show where this constant comes up.
//!
//! However, the exact set of "used" items (collected as described above), and therefore the exact
//! set of used constants, can depend on optimizations. Optimizing away dead code may optimize away
//! a function call that uses a failing constant, so an unoptimized build may fail where an
//! optimized build succeeds. This is undesirable.
//!
//! To fix this, the collector has the concept of "mentioned" items. Some time during the MIR
//! pipeline, before any optimization-level-dependent optimizations, we compute a list of all items
//! that syntactically appear in the code. These are considered "mentioned", and even if they are in
//! dead code and get optimized away (which makes them no longer "used"), they are still
//! "mentioned". For every used item, the collector ensures that all mentioned items, recursively,
//! do not use a failing constant. This is reflected via the [`CollectionMode`], which determines
//! whether we are visiting a used item or merely a mentioned item.
//!
//! The collector and "mentioned items" gathering (which lives in `rustc_mir_transform::mentioned_items`)
//! need to stay in sync in the following sense:
//!
//! - For every item that the collector gather that could eventually lead to build failure (most
//!   likely due to containing a constant that fails to evaluate), a corresponding mentioned item
//!   must be added. This should use the exact same strategy as the ecollector to make sure they are
//!   in sync. However, while the collector works on monomorphized types, mentioned items are
//!   collected on generic MIR -- so any time the collector checks for a particular type (such as
//!   `ty::FnDef`), we have to just onconditionally add this as a mentioned item.
//! - In `visit_mentioned_item`, we then do with that mentioned item exactly what the collector
//!   would have done during regular MIR visiting. Basically you can think of the collector having
//!   two stages, a pre-monomorphization stage and a post-monomorphization stage (usually quite
//!   literally separated by a call to `self.monomorphize`); the pre-monomorphizationn stage is
//!   duplicated in mentioned items gathering and the post-monomorphization stage is duplicated in
//!   `visit_mentioned_item`.
//! - Finally, as a performance optimization, the collector should fill `used_mentioned_item` during
//!   its MIR traversal with exactly what mentioned item gathering would have added in the same
//!   situation. This detects mentioned items that have *not* been optimized away and hence don't
//!   need a dedicated traversal.

enum CollectionMode {
    /// Collect items that are used, i.e., actually needed for codegen.
    ///
    /// Which items are used can depend on optimization levels, as MIR optimizations can remove
    /// uses.
    UsedItems,
    /// Collect items that are mentioned. The goal of this mode is that it is independent of
    /// optimizations: the set of "mentioned" items is computed before optimizations are run.
    ///
    /// The exact contents of this set are *not* a stable guarantee. (For instance, it is currently
    /// computed after drop-elaboration. If we ever do some optimizations even in debug builds, we
    /// might decide to run them before computing mentioned items.) The key property of this set is
    /// that it is optimization-independent.
    MentionedItems,
}
```
And the `mentioned_items` MIR body field docs:
```rust
    /// Further items that were mentioned in this function and hence *may* become monomorphized,
    /// depending on optimizations. We use this to avoid optimization-dependent compile errors: the
    /// collector recursively traverses all "mentioned" items and evaluates all their
    /// `required_consts`.
    ///
    /// This is *not* soundness-critical and the contents of this list are *not* a stable guarantee.
    /// All that's relevant is that this set is optimization-level-independent, and that it includes
    /// everything that the collector would consider "used". (For example, we currently compute this
    /// set after drop elaboration, so some drop calls that can never be reached are not considered
    /// "mentioned".) See the documentation of `CollectionMode` in
    /// `compiler/rustc_monomorphize/src/collector.rs` for more context.
    pub mentioned_items: Vec<Spanned<MentionedItem<'tcx>>>,
```

Fixes #107503